What if Meta’s hidden objective behind the Threads-to-Mastodon initiative is a play on app.net? And, what if threads.net is a measured step towards what could be the greatest pivot in all of tech?

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You’re right, we should all stop talking about and discussing problems and risks. And silently stare at each other tille someone else comes up with a solution.

    Step 1 in fixing a problem is to recognize and get awareness for it.

    Step 2 is garnering interest from the people who are qualified to actually make realistic proposals

    Step 3 is collaborating on ideas to figure out what will or won’t be effective, and to create new ideas by returning to step 2.

    Step 4 is to circle back to step 1, but for actions and implementations. Repeat ad nauseum.

    **We’re Still in Step 1. ** Complaining that we aren’t getting to the next step quick enough without providing assistance to get there is incredibly meta to this process 🤔

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think what they’re saying is that we’re beating step 1 to death. Do that enough and people start ignoring the articles. If all the articles are saying the same thing, it’s not adding much to the discussion.

      This article WAS a bit different though. It’s suggesting how the plan isn’t limited to microblogging or Mastodon but the fediverse as a whole, and what the process could look like