• 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is it just me or has 2023 been the year of the data breach? Maybe they are just larger or more widely reported. Just seems like there have been a fuck-ton of them this past year.

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        While true, I’m not convinced that fully explains it. Having been in IT nearly 2 decades I feel like the second piece is cybersecurity budgets getting slashed. A lot of them have been super-basic shit like someone clicking on a malicious link.

        • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh for sure, didnt mean to imply it was the only reason.

          Spearphishing high-value targets, or even just phishing a company’s email roster are very very common practices because they yield significant results.

          Theres also the “insurance approach” to cybersecurity, where its cheaper to run PR for a little while and/or take out insurance policies against cyber attacks such as ransomware. The latter is a key factor as to why many companies dont mind paying the ransom at all.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I bet 2024 will have more. More stuff is online and we don’t seem to be getting any better at securing it.

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think the problem is “we” securing things (we being cybersecurity professionals). I think the problem is companies seeing that it’s cheaper to take the PR hit, pay the ransom, pay for cybersecurity insurance, etc than it is to pay for a properly secured network.

        Cybersecurity is hard (citation needed) and costs a lot of money (citation needed). If a company figures it’s cheaper to have a breach and deal with the fallout than it is to properly secure shit I can promise you what will happen.

        As always, follow the $$$.

    • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Profit > Security. These companies don’t care so long as the consequences don’t affect profit significantly enough. Infosec is always an afterthought, if considered at all.

      • random65837@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Stupidest thing I’ve ever heard, you’ve clearly never worked for a company that’s dealt with a customer info data breach. It costs them massive amounts of money to clean them up, pay for identity protection (never take that) and the PR alone costs them more in the end.