• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You seem very fixated on Biden. You seem to think it’s a foregone conclusion that Trump will win and there will never be a Democrat in office again because he will win. I guarantee you that SCOTUS is not assuming he will win and they are not assuming Biden will be the last Democrat ever in office or that a Democrat would never do things Republicans really didn’t want to happen even though the Democrat had the legal right. Because those are not safe assumptions.

    • Rivalarrival
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Biden will hand over power peacefully. The questions are whether he does that in 1 year, or 5 years, and who will receive the powers he currently wields.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Huh? Where did I suggest it was a foregone conclusion?

      I think you’re naive if you think the Democrats would ever do anything meaningful in that situation. If that were the case, something would have been done years ago. They will not do such obviously unethical things (even if the potential outcome is good). That’s not how they have ever operated.

      Also, what would they even do?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Where did I suggest it was a foregone conclusion?

        Where you made this all about Biden as if there would never be another Democrat in the presidency again.

        I think you’re naive if you think the Democrats would ever do anything meaningful in that situation.

        Unlike you, I do not believe I can predict the future with that confidence. And I don’t think SCOTUS believes they can either.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Take it down a notch, dude, you’re coming in real hot and it’s not clear to me why.

          I never claimed I could predict the future. You really like putting words in my mouth.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is what you said:

            I think you’re naive if you think the Democrats would ever do anything meaningful in that situation.

            That is literally a prediction of the future. I did not put any words in your mouth.

            As far as “coming in real hot,” you are welcome to interpret what I say to you that way, but you would be incorrect.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              What would Democrats do? You think they’ll actually reform the Supreme Court? LOL. Even if they tried, it would never happen, and especially not before the election.

              I’m genuinely curious what you think the Democrats would do to “take advantage” of the hypothetical SCOTUS decision on Trump? What are conservative justices worried Democrats might do?

                • prole@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The implication here is that nobody ever makes plans because “they can’t predict the future.” That’s silly.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No, the implication here is that they might not rule in favor of Trump because they know the future is uncertain and doing that would be risky. I’m not sure how I could have made that more clear. If you can claim that they will definitely rule in favor of Trump then you will have certainly demonstrated your belief in your powers of prognostication.