• PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    83
    ·
    11 months ago

    A politically motivated attack on the greatest president America has ever seen, better than Lincoln even, to uphold the principles of democracy!

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You should probably edit your comment to include a /s tag if you are indeed being sarcastic.

            • Tedesche@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              …Alright, whatever then. Don’t complain about your downvotes, as many of them might be due to confusion.

              • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                11 months ago

                He isn’t complaining. It’s not the be-all and end-all for some people. I’d much rather be misunderstood than go ‘loooooool JK don’t downvote guyz!!!’ after a joke, which is exactly what ‘/s’ reads like.

                  • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    By looking at the what, when, where, whys of it you can garner enough context to tell. You can look at his other comments for one thing

        • Tedesche@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Given the prevalence of trolls and truly unhinged assholes on the internet these days, I think a /s tag is probably in order.

        • ouRKaoS
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Body language and inflections are nuances that are lost in text but contribute heavily to sarcasm.

          Also, it’s been really difficult these last few years to determine the difference between a blatant joke and someone’s perceived reality, which is downright terrifying if you think about it too long.

            • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s not psuedoscience, it’s simply the observation that, as this thread shows, it can often be difficult to tell the difference between satire and honestly held opinions. I question your understanding of the word “psuedoscience,” if you think it applies to Poe’s Law.

              • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s not what it means firstly, and secondly sociology is science, semiotics is science, and this waffle is masquerading as similar. Calling it a ‘law’ and wheeling it out as evidence contributes to that, convincing impressionable nerds that they need to backhand their jokes to avoid the dreaded downvote

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          The idea that someone would genuinely believe that isn’t very far fetched at all. If they’re being sarcastic, they’re not very good at it.

          • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s Poe’s Law in action. In this age of unreality it can be almost impossible to tell the difference between satire and honestly held opinions.