I’ll go first. Mine is that I can’t stand the Deadpool movies. They are self aware and self referential to an obnoxious degree. It’s like being continually reminded that I am in a movie. I swear the success of that movie has directly lead to every blockbuster having to have a joke every 30 seconds

  • tal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What would you have changed from the movies as they were?

    I mean, I can’t think of that many deviations from the books off-the-top-of-my-head. Tom Bombadil got cut, but he had a very different flavor from most of the rest of the series. Legolas “shield surfing” was an addition to the movies and was kind of obnoxious, IMHO, but it wasn’t that much of an ongoing thing. There were some changes around Aragorn going through the Paths of the Dead, but nothing there really bugged me.

    EDIT: I’m pretty sure that nothing in the books said that the charge of the reinforcements at Helm’s Deep was down that steep of a slope – that’s probably just not practical.

    clip in question

    • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just the beginning with the party, with dwarves in a sort of dance-cleaning party was absurd IMO.

      They’re there to fight or die, only Gandalf (IIRC) managed them to even consider taking a hobbit with them. It should have been grim, but with a take making it possible, not a song and dance performance.

      In all it’s too “American” (IMO) ; simplistic plot with easy to understand graphic battles. Then Win!

      I also hated the painful play of Frodon and Sam, like some sort of painful master/slave idiocy. Not naming a totally overplayed Gollum.

      Well well, I remember the end of the Hobbit was plaisant, and it was a long time ago I saw them so maybe I should rewatch them :-)

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You seem to be confusing the two trilogies, I don’t think many LOTR fans will defend The Hobbit movies for anything but the performances. Also with regards to “it’s all too American,” the LOTR films were written and directed by a New Zealander based on a story by a Brit

        • ofk12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          For American audiences though, that’s where the money is. And who produced it too. Not saying you’re wrong, just to anyone outside the US it has the feel of it.

          • mommykink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            and who produced it too

            From Wikipedia:

            Produced by

            Barrie M. Osborne (United States) Peter Jackson (New Zealand) Fran Walsh (New Zealand) Tim Sanders (New Zealand)

        • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t say it was an American movie, just that it is “too American”. Too dumbed down. Too “bad person bad, because ugly”, “good person good looking and will win”, graphic battles etc.

      • ofk12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Frodo/Sam dynamic comes from Tolkien’s experiences in WW1. A fair example of this dynamic would be the Blackadder/Baldrick dynamic in Blackadder Goes Forth.

        Apparently it was a thing where higher class soldiers had a bloke supporting him. Not sure if it was solely based on rank or social status