• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    What is with these people?

    They are CEOs of company’s, yet they don’t seem to understand how capitalism works. What’s something is worth is depending on what the market will bear. If the market won’t bear a $90 game then it isn’t worth $90.

    It’s a double edged sword

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Capitalism and the free market is supposed to encourage efficiency and innovation in order to remain competitive in order to keep prices low… Is Sony against capitalism? Is it against the free market? Is in adverse to innovation? C’mon Sony … Stop being lazy.

    • Shayeta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yes, yes, and yes. By securing a monopoly you will have the highest possible profit at lowest possible investment. That is the ultimate goal of every publicly traded company.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Sony, Nintendo and Xbox are not true capitalism because their consoles are not free markets so of course they don’t like capitalism when they benefit from absolute control and can fix the prices for everything in their ecosystem.

      The only true capitalistic store front is steam and funnily enough it’s doing laps around all 3.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Part of why steam is so successful is because they regularly do enormous discounts.

        People come to steam because of how good the deals are but they end up buying quite a lot at full prices as well.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If anything Steam showed us thay 60$ game is a stupid idea. Free markets pay what they feel like paying and thats when creators and consumers are the happiest not with price controll.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      When I first started working it was still back in the days where you were given cash in an envelope. After we were paid we always used to go out to a pub together for a few rounds, I rarely used to get through all of the change I’d been given, I never got into the paper money.

      You used to be able to get a pint for silvers, these days you need to give them folding money for a bag of peanuts.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve recently decided that I’m not spending more than $10 on a game until I’ve cleaned out my backlog.

    There’s hundreds of games in my backlog, so it’s going to be a while.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s hard for me to imagine anyone buying brand new AAA games these days. Between the huge back catalogues of previous gen consoles as well as the PC and the insane prices for new AAA games which don’t innovate very much anymore, I can’t see much reason spend that kind of money.

      I have a hacked New Nintendo 3DS and it can basically run every console emulator up to and including PS1 as well as natively run GBA, DS, and 3DS games. The library for the thing is enormous and with a 128GB microSD card you can store a ton of stuff on it.

      Oh and it can also run DOSBox and SCUMMVM games though I haven’t tried them so I can’t vouch for the play experience. I should think the stylus would make a decent mouse replacement but I’m not sure how well it works in practice. Arcade-style DOS games that use the keyboard only (Duke Nukem, Crystal Caves, Commander Keen) should work great though!

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        From what I understand, with the 3DS, you had to get roughly ‘Version 1’ of those before they changed the actual hardware to make… basically ‘rooting’ it more difficult… or maybe I’m thinking of the Switch?

        Either way, what I’m trying to say is basically ‘thats impressive’ if you were the one to actually uh… cough, install the sea shanties.

        I went the easier route and just have a Steam Deck, and yep, they are perfect for emulating basically everything up to roughly current gen - 2… and most stuff within the last two gens can be made to run on it in some way…

        … I was doinking about with the 3DS remaster of OoT earlier, and was actually very surprised to find that with my setup, the touchscreen… just worked as a 3DS touchscreen, I didn’t even think to intentionally configure it, accidentally poked the screen and oh well there ya go, lol.

        Anyway, yep, we are absolutely gonna see a uh ‘return to tradition’ so to speak, as many high budget high fidelity modern games… basically suck, and are outrageously expensive.

        As to a stylus as mouse for DOSBox and SCUMVM… i don’t know what the actual software configuration solution would look like there, but if the touch screen is high enough dpi dense… then it should at least conceptually work, as most of the games from that era that use a mouse are like, point and click adventures.

    • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      What do you mean? Our generous corporate overlords have kept the price steady for us at 60. We’re lucky they haven’t done scumbag things like a Deluxe edition for 80, a complete edition for 100, a ln ultimate edition for 120, an ultimate collector’s edition for 200, season passes for an extra 40, 10 different “micro” dlcs for 10 each, or cosmetic packs for 7 each. They’ve also definitely not cut content from the base game either!

    • b34k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      N64 game prices were $60-75 back when the console came out in 1996… so no, they’ve been static for almost 3 decades.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Nope, not going to argue against obviously dumb points from executives. Do it. Raise your prices yearly. Fuck it, you think prices need to increase? Increase them.

    It takes me five clicks to close Steam, open Firefox, open my favorite piracy site and download your game. Raise the fucking price, test how much I value my money versus five clicks.

  • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “There were more sports cars in the parking lot in the PS1 era than there were in the PS4 era, …"

    dude, fuck you, your parking lot and i wish that giant acme anvils drop on every fucking sports car you’ll ever own.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure the few overpaid execs that are “fuck you” rich are still there, and they’re probably richer than ever. However now they probably consider themselves too important to park with normal people. It’s all about private jets and helicopters.

      Tells a lot about this guy and his ilk that he thinks you measure a healthy company to how many assholes actively flaunt their money with shallow luxury shit.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    You can price your game however you want. But it doesn’t mean I need to buy it. I still have a choice.
    Not sure about the future where we will work for corporations for free and they will pay us with products we don’t want, because we’re heading this road pretty fast.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    One factor they don’t seem to consider is that they are competing for a finite resource: consumer attention.

    There has never been so much content to consume: not only games, movies, series, music, books, podcasts, and even old games.

    New games have to compete with and stand above all that content to justify the price.

    As others have said, purchase power is down, people subscribe to more services (net, mobile, streaming music and video), all that bites into the available budget to buy games.

    Bottom line: it’s getting hard to justify spending that amount on a game you don’t have time to play.

    • Tollana1234567
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      yea, cant justify the orignal switch and shtty swsh games, and then theres the new switch too.

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah it’s hilarious to me they wanna charge more and don’t expect to sell less. Ppl would go from being iffy about indie games to checking them out more if 4 at base price cost what a AAA one does