• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    That’s not quite correct. The judge specifically concluded that the Section 3 clause of the 14th Amendment that would exclude someone from holding office after inciting an insurrection simply did not matter for the presidency. They were somehow convinced that the President is not an “officer of the United States”, so Section 3 did not apply. I genuinely don’t understand how they were convinced of that. But they basically concluded that a sitting or former Congressman, Judge or soldier who commits insurrection can never hold office again without Congressional pardon, but someone who has only held the office of President like Trump can commit insurrection and not face similar consequences. Like that makes any sense.

    • Rivalarrival
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It may not matter for the presidency, but it absolutely matters for the Electoral College. Read the 14th amendment again: even if it doesn’t apply to the president himself, it explicitly applies to the electors of the president.

      Trump was declared an insurrectionist. If an electoral vote for Trump can be considered giving him “aid or comfort”, any elector intending to vote for him is unqualified to serve as an elector.