How to order a hamburger that’s mostly spit
Juicy
As if they aren’t already.
Jeepers, your idea of your average hospitality worker is pretty dark
I was implying that the meat® is from all of the animal… Also, I spent over two decades in the food industry (US, EU, etc.). Ask me for stories — if you don’t ever want to eat at any restaurants ever again.
Yeah but lips and anuses aren’t spit, I think OP was implying that if you attempted what is listed about the kitchen staff are going to make sure the contents of their sinuses form the main protein of your burger.
Yes, and animal fluids, et al, are not generally accounted for in the minds of those that consume said products. For instance, are you aware of the “acceptable” volume of fecal matter in “fast food” ingredients? 🤔
Yes, and fecal matter on food (meat or otherwise) has been the norm for all of human history. We just have ways of measuring it now and make rules about it.
That’s a very generous way of excusing corpo lobbying for barely-edible standards. 😅
I’m not going to say I’ve thought about it but I would expect it’s defined for a lot of countries (I’d be more worried if it wasn’t deck ed) and I’m going to assume in most cases it aligns with the regulation of fecal matter levels for other foods … unless a lobby group has convinced the relevant government body that they are mitigating it with some process like bleaching (also not great). But on the whole I would expect fast food meat to have the same acceptable level of fecal matter as mushrooms. Whether the level is a problem is going to depend on your country …
Boy wait until you find out what manure is
You’re gonna love the etymology of “awful”, neighbor. 🤓
They don’t have the time or hydration to do that to every order. They have to save that for the special customers.
Unrealistic. This is way too coherent. Needs more word salad.
Also he should start crying at one point.
Everything I hate is cultural marxism.
He is a racist and a bigot
Jordan Peterson is a charlatan
So… A good candidate for the next US president?
He’s Canadian.
That didn’t stop Ted Cruz from running a few years back
TIL. Goddamn it Alberta.
So is that worse?
So a good next us president
deleted by creator
Sealioning (source) + whataboutism. A very cheap method of trolling and exhausting the opponent of the argument which relies on the victim being unaware of sealioning and they’re being sealioned. It’s frustrating seeing JP fans think this is proof he’s a genius. it’s like Ben Shapiro, another rightwing “influencer” who constantly speaks fast and gish gallops on purpose and his fans think he’s a genius for that too
Don’t forget the constant motte and bailey.
That, too. For people who don’t know what that is (source)
The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the “motte”) and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the “bailey”).[1] The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, insists that only the more modest position is being advanced.[2][3] Upon retreating to the motte, the arguer may claim that the bailey has not been refuted (because the critic refused to attack the motte)[1] or that the critic is unreasonable (by equating an attack on the bailey with an attack on the motte).[4]
Thanks for teaching me something new!
Also your username is very apt for this thread.
Tankie “intelligencia” power houses use this as well.
Sir… this is a Wendy’s
McDonalds marketing is getting pretty aggressive if they’re sending their cashiers to Wendy’s…
The cashier is working undercover in order to steal the krappy patty’s secret formula.
“What did you find out, Steve? Did you get the formula?”
“Yeah, commercials, we just need more than the other guys. I don’t think our food matters, like, at all.”
False inductive reasoning combined with butwhataboutism and sealinoning. All designed to exhaust the opponent and muddy the argument. Conservatives love this form of argument.
Analyzing the conversation does not the joke get.
Yeah, I got the joke. I was talking about the inspiration for the joke that made it funny in the first place.
This is only missing JP coming up with a completely deranged definition of what fries are that he demands the cashier adheres to (I don’t think the vodka applies, that’s more making fun of the cashier). And also him entirely dodging the question of whether he likes fries, stating that people have discussed whether he likes fries but he refuses to reveal it.
Obviously fries represent the western civilization. Frying oil is the chaos dragon of woke left that means to destroy the fries, but will instead transform them into something even more beautiful, an entity of culinary perfection. But you would already know that if only you had bought my online course. sob It’s so sublime. sob
Employee listening in the background hears the timer for the fries go off. Pulls the basket out from the oil.
Looks at the fries.
Looks at the stand for them to drain.
Looks at Jordan Peterson.
Looks at the fries.
Shoves their own face into the hot oil to escape the sound of JP’s voice.
Great. Make your own version and post it. I’d love to see it.
Gets plain fries, but gets charged for vodka. Cashier points to vodka line on the bill and says “potatoes”, then points to fries and says “potatoes”.
Vodka. “Boil em, mash em, stick em in a stew…”
What’s vodka, precious?!
Dragging your opponent into the weeds does not a good argument make
Thanks Yoda
You i thank
Define “define”.
After not receiving the fried Jordan cries in his car.
define cries
Whom is car?!
“Colloquialism, motherfucker! Do you speak it‽”
Edit: corrected autocorrect incorrection
The “motherfucker” forced me to hear this in Samuel L Jackson’s voice.
He shoots, he scores!
lol the whole quote was a SLJ reference from one of his iconic lines, so you are right on the money
It depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.
My dog is an intellectual powerhouse compared to Jordan Peterson fans.
Lol. I just Googled him and his YouTube channel description reads…
“Join intellectual phenomenon Dr. Jordan B. Peterson for enlightening discourse”
It’s a phenomenon how much he lacks any intellectual capabilities.
with the amount of benzos he took, and coma that gave him brain damage, hes been reduced to only able to respond with emotional outbursts.
So, I haven’t heard much about JP in a while,and now I’ve heard a podcast and this. Is it just coincidence or is there a reason we’re talking about him again? The podcast mentioned he’d gone on some show debating Christianity with 20 atheists. It went as you might imagine, where jp argued that atheists were Christian because they didn’t understand the thing they say they don’t believe in. Idk. Anyway – any other reason I’m hearing about him again?
It’s mostly just that. The whole thing was a mess. The atheists were told they would be debating a Christian and prepared as such, but he won’t define himself as a Christian. So much time is wasted dancing around that. They had to change the title from Christian debates to Jordan Peterson debates. On top of that he will barely engage properly, saying things like he won’t entertain a hypothetical because he wouldn’t allow himself to get in that situation in the first place. Just generally not acting in good faith.
The guy is a notorious rhetorical shitmuffin.
He just strings fallacies together and his crowd along.
This video analysing that is pretty good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrdOamPIRGY
he was seen crying while have an emotional outburst arguing someone recently.
