• Fives@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The super-wealthy are a cancer on society, and just like cancer, they suck up all of the resources while killing the patient.

  • Et Al@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    Once you go beyond $100,000,000, there is no measurable difference in lifestyle. However, power accumulates. That amount of power shouldn’t be in the hands of so few.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 days ago

    He is right.

    Imagine a “billionaire” in the wild: An animal sitting on a vast horde of food that it could never eat while others starved around it … yea, it would not last long.

    Imagine a “billionaire” in a living body. A corporate money making entity would basically be a cancer that had to be removed to save the life of the patient.

  • splonglo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 days ago

    The wealth of the rich is still growing and it will continue to grow automatically until the middle class ceases to exist. If we do not take the assets back, it will become impossible for normal working people to ever buy a house, or have any economic power over their own lives at all - nevermind the political control or the media manipulation.

    Extreme wealth concentration is THE biggest issue facing society. Mamdani is absolutely right.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 days ago

    One cannot reign innocently: the insanity of doing so is evident. Every king is a rebel and a usurper.

    -Louis Antoine de Saint-Just, 1792

    Or, put in modern terms: There is no such thing as an innocent billionaire.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    4 days ago

    This needs to become the mainstream opinion. Billionaires and ultra wealthy shouldn’t exist. There is no trickling down or any of that stolen wealth coming back into the hands of average people.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    218
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bill Ackman, a billionaire hedge fund manager who has backed President Donald Trump in the past, on Thursday pledged to use his money to bankroll a challenger to Mamdani in the general election.

    Case in point.

    • MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      And how did he get those billions? How many peoples necks did he have to step on to climb his way up. It’s not so much what you do with your billions, it’s how you got them that makes you evil. The only exception to this is probably Bezos ex wife, maybe.

      • bajabound@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        “Employees are the rungs on the ladder of success. Don’t hesitate to step on them.” -Rule of acquisition #211

        • SabinStargem
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          Grand Nagus Rom: “We invented elevators for a reason.”

      • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        4 days ago

        She was working for a hedge fund when she met him and they were married for 26 years. She may have given away $19 billion of her fortune, but her net worth is still $36 billion, the same as the original divorce settlement.

    • mienshao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This might induce me to donate to Mamdani’s campaign. I live in fucking Illinois btw.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Honestly, even if you think billionaires should exist, it’s still the most logical action for Mamdani to oppose them as billionaires will do everything to stop him.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    4 days ago

    Even the billionaires would be better off without billinaires. It their relative ranking was the same they would still have more money than they could spend but it would now come with clean air, water, land, better infrastructure, a healthier world, happier people to interact with.

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    4 days ago

    Imagine life was a game. You lived for 2025 years. You worked 260 days / year. You made the median US salary.

    You would need to relive that process 3,145 times to match an Oligarch.

    That amount of wealth is unethical while humanity suffers. No one can really fathom “1b dollars.”