• bremen15@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its slop if its useless or wrong. If it is i will come back and edit it. I need to test it first.

    • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I guess if people want to read answers generated by an LLM, they would just ask one.

    • Madrigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The anti-AI morons on Lemmy can’t or won’t tell the difference. They think “slop” is just a term for any LLM-generated (or refined) content. There’s no nuance to their thinking at all. They don’t assess the quality of the information provided or how the tool is actually being used.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Given the sources don’t really back up the content, I think it’s safe to say this is slop. You should probably proof AI slop before you white knight it next time.

        • Madrigal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The question was about document management systems that can be run in docker. The LLM response listed four document management systems that can be run in docker.

          Was it a perfect response? No.

          Was it a useful response? Yes.

          Was it a better contribution to the discussion than yours? Lol.

          • thesmokingman@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            The current thread is about AI slop, not DMS. You helped create the branch we’re on. You said “people on Lemmy can’t tell slop from useful info.” I said “this is AI slop because the sources don’t match,” assuming that I wouldn’t have to explain the hallucinations (fabrications is a bit better here) because that usually comes with slop. Since the current thread is about whether or not slop is meaningful, I have no idea what you added by saying “hey I attacked someone for not liking AI then attacked someone else for a refutation of the AI that I was white knighting.”