I’ve been listening to Guerrilla Warfare this week and it’s just had me thinking about Che more generally, particularly how he was essentially killed trying to replicate the Cuban pattern in Bolivia.
Was his strategy adventurist? Did it become adventurist by applying it in the wrong conditions? Were the Cuban revolutionaries just adventurists that got lucky - (Fidel wasn’t even communist at the time so it’s hard to say they were following some kind of Leninist line)? Do we just call armed insurrections adventurism if they fail, heroism if they win?
I wouldn’t consider myself an expert on Che or the movements he fought in, I know a decent amount about Cuba, but very little about his time in Africa or elsewhere. Looking to start a discussion and hopefully be educated by comrades who are more well-read on this topic.
what does commandist mean ?
In vulgarized terms, its the inverse of tailism.
In more elaborated terms, its where a party or its leadership dictates revolutionary action from ahead of the proletariat without adequately considering the actual conditions or the will of the masses. The tendency of commandism usually manifests in the form of an impatience to jump directly to open revolution, bypassing critical stages of development of dual power structures and neglecting the importance of mass mobilization and education.
In some circles commandism is also called “Left-Adventurism”
Thanks for the answer. Have a good day/night wherever you are