• tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    How was this hardly 50 years ago, but I’ve never heard of it at all? Very selective about modern history in schools i guess

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I mean, I’m interested in military history, but I wouldn’t have put it in a standard curriculum. It’s not really a globally-significant event. You don’t have a whole lot of time allocated for history, much less military history, and you gotta triage what you cover. We had a very small amount of time for World War II, which was much-more significant, and I don’t think my classes even did the Korean War at all.

      EDIT: It looks like The Operations Room did a video on YouTube on Operation Paul Bunyan. They kinda rely more on memoir stuff than would be my ideal, but they’re usually at least decent. I don’t think I’ve watched this one.

      EDIT2: No memoir stuff in this one.

      • tisktisk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’m more concerned with how teachers weight ancient vs contemporary history. I feel like most things taught are so far back in such a different era, the truths must be significantly tougher to find/grasp, right? So why the back toward current timeline chronology? “The only thing we’ve ever learned from history is that we can’t learn from history”

        • tal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean, I don’t know about you, but I didn’t cover that much ancient history either.