Several service members told advocacy groups they felt like pawns in a political game and assignment was unnecessary

California national guards troops and marines deployed to Los Angeles to help restore order after days of protest against the Trump administration have told friends and family members they are deeply unhappy about the assignment and worry their only meaningful role will be as pawns in a political battle they do not want to join.

Three different advocacy organisations representing military families said they had heard from dozens of affected service members who expressed discomfort about being drawn into a domestic policing operation outside their normal field of operations. The groups said they have heard no countervailing opinions.

“The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn’t the kind of national security we signed up for,” said Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative, which represents the interests of military spouses, children and veterans.

  • SaltSong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Again, it’s one thing to expect them to reject orders they know are illegal, such as firing on civilians. It’s another thing entirely to expect them to reject orders the legality of which may be a supreme court case next week.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, nobody here knows what they are talking about. “I won’t go, I refuse to go.” Cool, here come the MPs, you go straight to jail. This shit happened quick. It wasn’t like these units had time to talk and maybe try to form a unified front. They got mobilized quick, and so any choice you make, you’re doing it on your own.

      And so is it right to disobey? Maybe. Is it easy? Absolutely not, and to suggest that is foolish, but easy to do from behind a desk.

      And so I think they’ll do what they must. They’ll show up, they’ll stand in a line, and they’ll hope they don’t need to do any more than that. And it goes unsaid that there’s some morons who want to beat on people, but they’re the 10%. The rest of them don’t want to be there.

      • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was just following orders.

        Also even if there are 10% who just want to beat people, are the other “good guys” stopping them? One of these cowardly cunts shot a reporter point blank and the ones areund him were more like: good job than: wtf, you can’t do that. Go lick their boots and thank them for their great service.

    • Krono
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It seems we are in agreement then, the troops are self-interested rational actors; all of the supposed virtues are propaganda.

      But I think there is a moral imperative that says “do not obey immoral orders”, and that imperative does not come with a clause that says “unless there is a pending court case”.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        But I think there is a moral imperative that says “do not obey immoral orders”

        Is it immoral to get on a plane, and go sleep on the floor somewhere?

        • Krono
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No, plane rides and sleepy time are not immoral in my opinion :)

          There’s probably a good argument about plane emissions and climate change tho