Trump’s lawyers claim they’ve found a loophole that will allow Trump to ship immigrants overseas to be tortured.

Federal law states that the United States shall not “expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture.” This law implements a treaty, known as the Convention Against Torture, which the United States ratified more than three decades ago.

Federal regulations, moreover, provide that even after an immigration judge has determined that a noncitizen may be deported to another country, that judge’s order “shall not be executed in circumstances that would violate Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture.” And those regulations also establish a process that immigrants can use to raise concerns with an immigration judge that they may be tortured if sent to a specific country.

The Trump administration, however, claims it has discovered a loophole that renders all of these legal protections worthless, and is now asking the Supreme Court to explicitly give it the authority to make use of that loophole in order to enact its immigration policies.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Obama should have done a lot of things. I’m happy he did Obamacare but man he could have been so much more. Such a wasted chance. And making Biden his VP was a catastrophic error. Biden sabotaged the shit out of everything he touched.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Obamacare despite the Republicans throwing the mother of all tantrums about it was such a weak half assed piece of legislation. It was literally a Republican policy before Obama stole it and rebranded it. What he ran on and promised was a proper single payer healthcare the same as the rest of the world has. What we got was a federal search engine for insurance policies and very minor guarantees of what those policies will cover (and even that small gain is increasingly in danger of being removed).

      Obama was one of the least offensive presidents of recent memory, but that’s far from being a good president. He certainly did some good things, but not as many as his reputation would make you think.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It was literally a Republican policy before Obama stole it and rebranded it.

        And before members of the democratic caucus nerfed it even further.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would put him pretty high but that itself is sorta sad. Its like the last pope. I would like a world where there was cardboard cutout at the white house saying you have to be this competent to be president. In other words I wish that was the minimum level for a president rather than being one of the better one historically.

    • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Did Biden really have that much influence? I think it can be hard to assess how influential a VP is/was.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t think it’s so much about what he did as VP as much as the fact that his time as VP kind of set him up to run for president later.