I was looking up footage of the ICE LA thing the other day and about 2/3 comments are just “HELL YEAH! THIS IS WHAT I VOTED FOR! KICK THESE CRIMINALS OUT!”

Holy shit amerikkka

  • Muinteoir_Saoirse [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s still not a great metric of ethnic cleansing. Relative populations of white people in Canada are decreasing, does that mean there is ethnic cleansing of white Canadians? Of course not. The same also goes the other way: an exploited group’s relative population increasing does not mean they are not exploited. Population levels are not on their own a very useful metric for trying to understand whether a group is being oppressed.

    There are much better arguments to use that are clear indicators of oppression/systemic violence, since population on its own is not inherently correlated to racial discrimination. It’s so much more effective to point to, as you mention yourself, the exclusion of ethnic minorities from the one-child policy, or the increase in life expectancy, the elimination of absolute poverty, the increase in health care, cultural/religious protections, civic engagement, etc in Xinjiang (or other regions with large minority populations) to dispel myths about Chinese targeting/elimination of minority populations.

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I would say a decrease in relative population is not enough to positively confirm ethnic cleansing is happening (just one indicator), however an increase in relative population is sufficient to dismiss any claims of ethnic cleansing or genocide.