This is my current understanding of the situation:

  • The admins are no longer interested in running the instance, due to increasing demand, missing moderation features and waves of abuse from external actors.
  • Transferring the instance to someone else is a complicated issue. Even though there is not a large amount of private information in Lemmy’s database, you can not simply transfer the trust the users placed in the original admin to the new owner.
  • Lemmy still does not provide an easy way to migrate accounts

Given all the above, shutting down the instance seems to be the natural course of action. I’d like to propose an alternative: freeze the instance activity and keep it in some form of “read-only” mode until Lemmy matures.

What would that require?

  1. Take the instance down (no more incoming activities)
  2. Run a script that generates static json files for every actor (user, community), federated object (post, comment, report) and activity (like/dislike votes, announce activities, etc)
  3. Set up a static site to serve all that JSON.
  4. Take the media on pict-rs and move to some long-term back up system.
  5. (Optional, but could be helpful in the future) allow users to checkout the private keys of their own user and community actors.

This won’t help solve the current problems and it wouldn’t help with the users who now will have to move away to a new instance, but it could eventually help for users who want to restore the activity on a new server.

I’ve been experimenting with an implementation for Decentralized Identifiers for ActivityPub that can make it possible for people to move servers but maintain their identity (similar to bluesky’s PLC directory), so perhaps we could have a future where users can fully migrate their accounts from server to server without requiring intervention from admins.

  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    When I open an alt, admins usually check out with me to see if it’s actually me.

    Usernames are not “copyrighted” across instances for very good reasons

    Try to open a “dessalines” or “jordanlund” account elsewhere, you’re probably going to get questioned about it.

    other than what you voluntarily provide on your own profile sig.

    Yes, that’s a way to link your accounts.

    • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Questioned yes, and for fair reason, but nothing technically or legally prevents it, also for good reason. Would you say for example that Jordan Lund has an automatic legal claim to the username “jordanlund” everywhere? How about Jordan B. Lund? Or Jordan S. Lund? Or Jörd Anlund? Don’t they have just as much “right” to that username, even if it is in a different instance?

    • Donald J. Musk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Definitely some bad actors out there though. There’s a guy opening several accounts under my name. Luckily so far, most of the instances are pretty good at taking him down when I bring it up. Except .world of course. They ignored all my messages. lol

      So yeah, there is a Donald J. Musk on .world: @donaldjmusk@lemmy.world. Not me tho! :)