• arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        And yes this could include any young women and girls but instead of saying both nouns he says one noun that includes both discriptors which is female instead of girl or young women

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              So “young women” instead of “young females” would have been more clear and appropriate?

              • arin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Idk what exactly was op’s intended target, but from his language it’s mostly young females did not accept his friend request, which does not signify a lpwer bound age limit.

                Edit to be more specific, coz this is dragging out. Young women should not include children. But op’s language does not exclude minors.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  That’s my point. If OP wanted to use clearer language “Young Women” would have been better, unless they are in fact creeping on children.

                  • arin@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Wouldn’t be surprised if op was also underaged. My exgf was deep into 4chan before i met her in college. W/e