Most of you said you’d switch to Proton Mail for the privacy, even if it meant giving up some of the convenience of Gmail.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I never quite understand why people use Proton. It just automates the exchange of PGP/GPG keys, but only if the other person also uses Proton, right?

    Anyhow, +1 to paying a small amount of money for email. I was with posteo.de myself for many years. I heard mailbox.org is even better/safer and has slightly more features. Both start at 1€/month.

    BTW, I set up an eternal redirect email address a long time ago, so I can change the actual provider without having to tell all my contacts.

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      To be precise, even when an email is not from Proton user, they encrypt it with ypur public key, send it to you and delete it (they call it zero access). Which is the best you can get. Also managing PGP keys, especially on multiple devices is a pain.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is actually good to know. OTOH, aren’t all messages transfered using encryption with most email providers/clients anyhow (TLS/SSL)? This is mostly about making sure your data on the servers stays safe even if someone gains access, right?

        • sudneo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          So, TLS is just a point-to-point encryption protocol, it doesn’t prevent anybody of the parties involved from having access to the content. Once the email is encrypted with PGP, Proton loses permanently access to this content.

          So this is pretty much what happens with a Gmail <-> Outlook and a Gmail <-> Proton email.

          Gmail to outlook:

          A writes the email in their editor <- TLS -> Google servers <-TLS-> outlook servers <-TLS-> B reads the email. While every communication is encrypted with TLS, every server has access to its content. Every time B accesses the email from outlook servers (I.e., their inbox), the data is transferred with TLS, but outlook is the “other end of the tunnel”, so it has access to this content.

          Gmail to Proton:

          A writes the email in their editor <- TLS -> Google servers <-TLS-> Proton servers -> encrypt original message with B’s public key and discard original -> send to B inbox -> Proton client decrypts email -> B accesses it.

          So yes, it is

          about making sure your data on the servers stays safe even if someone gains access

          As long as you consider the email provider part of those potential “someone”.

          The way I would say it essentially is that PGP encryption (even in cases where the original messages was not using it) still gives you the confidentiality property of PGP, even without the integrity and non-repudiation properties (which are not possible to guarantee with respect of the original message of course). In other words, the biggest difference is that the email provider doesn’t have access to your stuff.

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      It also encrypts your emails automatically (both incoming and outgoing) and lets you set PGP keys for any address you want, and fetch/manually trust Proton Mail users’ keys.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        encrypts your emails automatically (outgoing)

        How does that work for recipients I haven’t shared secrets with?

        BTW any decent email client has an option or plugin to do that.

        • Kairos
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The outgoing email leaving the server isn’t encrypted.

          The copy that’s stored on your account is encrypted on device with your PGP key.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        spend the next months transferring all relevant emails.

        Why don’t you just keep them on your machine? No need to clutter online storage with old mails.

        Oh wait, you probably don’t use email client software.

        • P1nkman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think you’ve misunderstood, and my writing was bad. I meant transferring all my accounts to the new email domain, not move all emails (I have already downloaded them) 🙂

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, tuta encrypts the subject, which is not encrypted in Proton for example.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      But if you have a redirect isnt that service the issue? As in your gmail forwards to proton?

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Sorry I am trying to understand the usefulness of an eternal redirect email address? Im just not familiar with the set up or reasoning.