• NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Of course not. It is your interpretation that having a nickname implies cult membership that is the logical fallacy.

        The argument is:

        • If CULT, then NICKNAME
        • i.e. If X, then Y

        Your interpretation seems to be:

        • If NICKNAME, then CULT
        • i.e. If Y, then X

        Which is the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It is your interpretation that having a nickname implies cult membership

          That’s OP’s claim. My interpretation is that he gave Simon the nickname out of affection not domination

          • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            That’s OP’s claim.

            No it’s not.

            OP’s claim is that cults give nicknames. Not that all entities that give nicknames are cults.

            But your second statement makes me realize that you likely have an inherent bias that is preventing you from seeing the logic involved.