LadyButterfly@lemmy.world to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 13 hours ago

What unusual food combo do you like?

23

What unusual food combo do you like?

LadyButterfly@lemmy.world to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 13 hours ago

Chat

🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦@ttrpg.network
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
7·
10 hours ago
Hot chocolate with chili powder.
- LadyButterfly@lemmy.worldOP
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  4·
  7 hours ago
  That is a winning combination indeed
- ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  2·
  7 hours ago
  is that unusual?
  - 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2·
    7 hours ago
    I’m the only person I ever met who does it, so … it’s probably not common?
    - Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3·
      7 hours ago
      Seems like a simplified take on Mexican Hot Chocolate.
    - ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1·
      6 hours ago
      It’s very common throughout Mesoamerica and anyplace with that influence (like Chicago, where I live).

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

casualconversation@lemm.ee

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !casualconversation@lemm.ee

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

289 users / day
988 users / week
3.27K users / month
8.77K users / 6 months
32 local subscribers
3.27K subscribers
1.01K Posts
23.8K Comments
Modlog