• ggppjj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’ve heard these described as a “legally acceptable way of filtering out people with autism” and man I’ve not seen them the same way since.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not that I necessarily think they’re trying to discriminate against people with autism giving blood, but there’s one of these on the blood donation intake questionnaire.

      Intake Questionnaire: In the last year, have you used any illegal drugs via needle injection?

      Me: No.

      IQ: In the last year, have you had sex with anyone who uses illegal drugs via needle injection?

      Me (married): Well, it’s not as if I can keep an eye on my wife 24/7… you know what, I’m just going to mark it No.

      IQ: In the last year, have you had sex for money?

      Me: No.

      IQ: In the last year, have you had sex with anyone who has had sex for money?

      Me: I’M TELLING YOU, I CAN’T KEEP AN EYE ON HER AT ALL TIMES, SO FUNDAMENTALLY I CANNOT GIVE A CERTAIN ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION!

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In what way? Are autistic people more likely to value company profits over personal goals?

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not really, in this case the more literally you read the question the better. It asks what responsibility you acquire when you have a job not why you got the job.

    • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I have had a theory that the personality tests are just to have an excuse to discriminate with plausible deniability.

      • LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yep quite a few years back I had two jobs lined up , already got the first but the second one wanted a second interview after I filled in a 50 page personality test. I felt the first offer would be interesting and better paid but wanted to see what they offered. So I said why not just be completely honest instead of faking it :) very interesting interview, I just told them that whoever sold them this idea was probably a very good salesman. The tool is just pointless. I got to much risk taking etc , yea I like skydiving… I’m not skydiving at work. … if you want people to bullshit you it’s pretty good though haha

    • Caesium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      15 hours ago

      yep when I applied to work at target a few years ago, there should have been absolutely no reason for them to not consider me but I took that thiny veiled screening test and wow I suddenly don’t get a response.

      fuck corpos man