• TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I mean I don’t like tankies either but is this user wrong? it’s a little weird to use these flippant (and frankly, derogatory) stereotypes about China when there are so many examples of it around the world

    it’s 2025 and we’re in middle of a trade war with china, just recovering from “kung flu” narratives and the far right just ran on a platform of fearmongering about china to initiate a fascist takeover of the USA.

    maybe we should be mindful of how we talk about China.

    • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I mean I don’t like tankies either but is this user wrong?

      Yes. Do you have reputable sources that show no chinese goods are made using Uyghur forced labor?

        • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          No, not really. But I’m sure we can find some “got-ya” if we keep going. Carry on.

          Edit: you got anything else? Or was that it?

          • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Look, this isn’t about gotchas, can we be cool for a second here? I’m not doing this. The point is that even though the global economic system has abuses everywhere, you chose to use an example that is both racially and politically charged. When called out about it, specifically that there are numerous examples that both hit closer to home and lack the baggage of your chosen example, how did you react? You immediately dismissed the criticism as coming from a group who you view as holding a number of untenable positions, thus allowing you to dismiss the criticism without engaging with it.

            This is the group-think mentality that causes us all problems. It’s nothing personal man. Just please be sensitive that there’s a lot of rhetoric around China right now that ultimately comes back to hurt your own neighbors.

            (I mention chocolate because it’s such a poignant example: something many of us enjoy regularly is primarily produced via child labor. I think that would have been the best way to make your point about there being multiple scumbags, including people who don’t tip and people who eat chocolate.)

            • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              The point is that even though the global economic system has abuses everywhere, you chose to use an example that is both racially and politically charged.

              It was one example, pulled out of my ass, out of a myriad. And it wasn’t even the point of the post. I’m not going to be assed to edit it.

              When called out about it, specifically that there are numerous examples that both hit closer to home and lack the baggage of your chosen example, how did you react? You immediately dismissed the criticism as coming from a group who you view as holding a number of untenable positions, thus allowing you to dismiss the criticism without engaging with it.

              .ml users commenting on china are more often than not, arguing in bad faith, so I’m not wasting any energy there. And I’m guessing this is your non ml alt.