Back in January Microsoft encrypted all my hard drives without saying anything. I was playing around with a dual boot yesterday and somehow aggravated Secureboot. So my C: panicked and required a 40 character key to unlock.

Your key is backed up to the Microsoft account associated with your install. Which is considerate to the hackers. (and saved me from a re-install) But if you’ve got an unactivated copy, local account, or don’t know your M$ account credentials, your boned.

Control Panel > System Security > Bitlocker Encryption.

BTW, I was aware that M$ was doing this and even made fun of the effected users. Karma.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They desperately wanted to eliminate personal computers and replace them with dumb terminals running over the net.

    When the public rejected this idea

    THIS is their response. They are still insisting on total control of our computers.

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Not to mention DRM. They want to own your computer and prevent any kind of modification so that movie producers give them money.

    • VitoRobles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They desperately wanted to eliminate personal computers and replace them with dumb terminals running over the net.

      I don’t know about that.

      Dumb terminal concept was more what Chromebook was doing.

      Microsoft is doing something even stupider.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        I think they want you to only use Windows and pay for cloud storage.

        By enforcing BitLocker and Secure Boot, they are trying to eliminate dual-booting (you don’t need to dual-boot Windows/Linux anyway, as you can just use WSL2 /s).

        By enforcing disk encryption, in general, they try to force the use of cloud storage, by making data recovery nearly impossible. Most people are probably too lazy to buy external storage, and manually copy their files over.

        This guarantees 2 money streams. One from Windows’s tracking/advertising and the other from OneDrive subscriptions.

      • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Dumb terminal concept was more what Chromebook was doing.

        I mean, for a lot of people they’re fine especially if they’re priced appropriately. Especially with a lot more software as a service out there. My problem is that all of them have a built in drop dead date on when they’re going to stop getting updates and there’s not really a great option for the devices post ChromeOS.

        ChromeOS certainly can be a good system. I still have my old CR-48 from when I got selected to test the OS and even when it was in its infancy, it was solid. I used it for a lot of my college career because it was better than my Asus eeePC which had Ubuntu on it.

        • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Good luck locking loose mainboards sold for the DIY market, which don’t come with anything installed by default, to a given OS, the only way that could maybe work is forcing the OS in ROM.

          Another way would be to discontinue the socketed desktop form factors and replace them all with mini PCs that are as locked down as the current Macs.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Thinking for two seconds:

            MS pays Google to start enforcing some device verification thing so you can only view a good chunk of the Internet if you pass verification? (Assumes Google goes even harder making the web Chrome-focused)

            Ooh Cloudflare could be invited to the party here too. Constant CAPTCHAs if you’re not on an MS AUTHENTI-PC! device. (Think Private Access Token)

            …fill in the gaps friends 😉 you know MS has already debated all your “suggestions” anyway

            • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              So you’re suggesting MS will somehow block non-Windows OSes from installing, even on hardware like loose mainboards for building your own PC with, or even on barebones mini PC kits or certain laptop SKUs, which don’t ship with an OS installed to begin with and expect the user to install it themselves? I mean, unless something extreme happens like changing the entire PC platform to be like the current Macs, that won’t be feasible.

              Also, doing that would kill the Steam Deck which I doubt Valve would take sitting down.

              • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                SecureBoot pretty much does this. There is nothing preventing motherboard manufacturers from blocking adding non-MS keys if they wanted to.

                • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Except AFAIK loose mainboards aimed at the DIY market, as well as barebones kits, don’t ship with SecureBoot turned on by default and an off switch for that is mandatory to the PC spec.