Doesn’t even know the presidential oath he pledged.

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    Oh he literally forgot the oath of the presidency? Sounds like a good reason to invoke the 25th amendment.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    You just gotta love it that this shit stain is supported by constitution lovers

  • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED! THIS MAN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY RESPONSIBLE POSITION! HE SHOULDN’T BE IN CHARGE OF A LEMONADE STAND MUCH LESS A COUNTRY! WHY DID AMERICA ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN! THE MAN DOESN’T WANT TO DO HIS JOB OF UPHOLDING THE CONSITUTION! THAT’S LIKE A DOCTOR SAYING THEY DON’T KNOW IF THEY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH! TRUMP AND ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS NEED TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON! WHY HAS THIS MADNESS GONE ON SO LONG!

    • 1984
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I dont even trust the voting system. There has been many attempt at manipulating the results. Maybe America didnt allow this.

      Doesnt matter though. This guy is awful and dangerous as president.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      THERE IS NO ADULT WAITING IN THE WINGS TO SWOOP IN AND SAVE YOUR NATION! BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE! THE REASON NO ONE IS STOPPING THIS IS EVERYONE IS BUSY ASKING “WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED!”!

      • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        What are you doing then? I see a lot of people chastising others for not doing anything while also not doing anything

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    At this point I’m just curious how long this will go on. What would have to tilt for a group of politicians to overhaul his ass and the r’s supporting him?

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I AGREE! The Founders had NO IDEA what the Future would be LIKE when they Wrote it!

    -People who VIGOROUSLY DEFEND School Shooters because of the Second Amendment!

    • redhat421@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m mad at the Democrats for under signing a genocide thus disaffecting their would be voters.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        the world is not binary. there are many people who bare part of the responsibility:

        • the republican party - all of them
        • republican voters
        • the democratic party
        • no-voters (who didn’t want to “support genocide” and now you have a worse genocide and a bunch of other horrible shit including a shit load of extra war crimes in ukraine for the foreseeable future)
        • the media

        these and many more can have played a part all at the same time

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            it’s worth calling out all on their own because it surfaces a specific problem… just saying “billionaires ruin everything” isn’t helpful, because it simply shifts blame to a nebulous concept that’s further removed from everyday people

            also, following orders is no excuse

            • Landless2029@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That’s valid.

              There used to be laws to force news stations to be bipartisan and show both sides.

              Copypasta:

              The “Fairness Doctrine,” which once required broadcasters to present contrasting viewpoints on controversial issues, was eliminated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1987.

      • huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Ikr, so hard to blame the republicans and the people who didn’t vote for the shit us is in rn /s

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

    -President Trump, just this year.

  • carrion0409@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    16 hours ago

    All I can do is laugh at this point. This regime is so buffoonish and so open with their intentions that I genuinely wonder how people fell for this shit and continue to believe it. Are we really this fucking dumb ?

      • carrion0409@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Oh yeah same. I was in 5th grade when trump first won and from the get go i could tell he was full of shit. I was taught very young not to trust the rich lol

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Thankyou for making me feel very old :) Btw, don’t trust anyone with something to sell.

          • carrion0409@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            When you have a mom who works in fraud prevention you learn stuff like that very young lol

    • Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, we sit around and laugh about how stupid he is while he ignores the law and constitution to the detriment of the freedom of citizens and immigrants alike.

      We are literally that stupid.

      • carrion0409@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I want an extensive study done on the brains of maga supporters when this is over. I need to know what is going on up there that makes them act the way they do.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          More research is always good, as it can deepen our understanding, but the basic outline of what’s going on is already known. A lot of people just don’t want to believe it, because we’re all stuck on the metaphor that we’re all captains of the ship inside our own heads. You see it in this thread; people want to blame non-voters, as if millions of people all had perfect information and all made decisions based upon it through conscious reasoning. Because they’re just—I dunno—bad people? (Which is a completely bonkers belief when you start to dig into it.)

          Actually, neuroscience tells us that consciousness doesn’t really exist, except as an emergent phenomenon of sensory experience. Brain scans show that thoughts, feelings, and decisions occur before we’re consciously aware of them; the conscious mind is basically a rationalization machine, inventing narratives about why we did a thing or felt a certain way, only after the fact. And, it’s notoriously bad at it. (The Misattribution of Arousal is one of the classic examples.) So, if you can affect the way that somebody’s brain works, you can in many ways control what the they think and feel.

          And that’s exactly what authoritarian demagogues do.

        • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I’ve concluded that MAGA people are as afraid of diversity, equity, and inclusion as normal people are of fascism. Their brains react to things like social acceptance of transgender people with the same horror to which our brains react to Trump sending people to concentration camps.

        • huppakee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There has been a lot of study done to ‘normal’ Germans after Hitler took over, I expect the result to overlap.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Same thing that’s been going on for millenia now. Humans being humans, look around the globe and through history. This is not new and we are not special.

          Sucks though.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

    They don’t care. All they care about is their in-group is strong and the out-group is punished. They’re shitty people.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    181
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    This is the oath he had to make when he took office.

        • D_C@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Lies!
          His hands are far too tiny for his fingers to cross.

          • rayyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            he didn’t even place a hand on the Bible.

            Fact!. For all his claims of being a “Christian”, he couldn’t be bothered.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Pretty crazy that it’s sworn in the Bible when the state is supposed to be separated from the church

            • Mooncheeze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              I’m pretty sure each person chooses a document/book to swear on that is core to them. So most people in the US would choose the Bible because they identify as Christian, but if a Jewish person or Muslim person was sworn in they could choose the Torah or Quran. And a non-religuous person could choose anything that they could convinceably argue is important/core to their values.

              Disclaimer: I did no research right now to confirm this but that’s what I remember.

                • Dragomus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  I did not know this … it is both awesome and interesting.

                  I think the act of being sworn in should also be on one’s passport, give it more weight that if you break the oath you lose the citizenship.

            • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              The separation of church and state is exactly why the president can be sworn in on a bible. Barring a member of office from swearing in on a religious text would specifically violate their first amendment right to practice religion. Importantly, the state doesn’t require them to use a bible, and it also doesn’t prevent them from doing so.

              That’s the whole point of separation of church and state. If the state required a religious text, that would be establishing a national religion. And if the state prevented it, that would be infringing on peoples’ right to practice religion.

              It doesn’t need to be a religious text at all. It simply needs to be something that is important to the person being sworn in. Technically, you could be sworn in on a copy of the constitution itself, or some handwritten letters from your mother, or a stack of hentai comics.

              • Almacca@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Technically it’s a performative ritual and serves no real purpose. The swearing of the oath is the only important bit and should be enough. You humans and your weird attachment to symbols and artifacts. :)

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Coming from a place where we practice laïcity, it’s a weird way to separate the State and religion to say that people can swear allegiance on a religious book.

            • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              20 hours ago

              It’s actually not mandatory that a Bible, or any religious text be used for swearing in a president. There’s nothing stating that a Jewish president couldn’t use the Torah or a Muslim president couldn’t use the Koran. We’ve just only had Christian presidents so far, though not all of them have used bibles for the ceremony.

              Separation from church and state only pretty much states that congress can make no laws favoring one religion over another or make any laws prohibiting the practice of one’s religion. To prohibit a president from swearing in on a religious text of their choice would, in and of itself, be a first amendment violation. Saying they have to, would also be a violation. The strict separation of church from the state, freedom from religion or the “wall of separation,” is something people have argued for, but isn’t actually laid out in the constitution.

          • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Probably

            A. Pissed it wasn’t one from his merch store

            B. Afraid that if he touched a real Bible, he’d burst into flames.

    • blattrules@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The “best of his ability” part is troubling because I have zero faith in his ability to do anything except turn our country into a cesspool.

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Although all it would take is one phone call to release Kilmar, Trump never learned how to use a phone. Checkmate, libtards.