cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 1 month agoThe "economy"lemmy.mlimagemessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1907arrow-down111cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1896arrow-down1imageThe "economy"lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square23linkfedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoDecreasing the rate of loss is good. Not great. Just good. It’s certainly better than average, since average was a much bigger loss. But it’s semantics. We need to do better regardless.
Decreasing the rate of loss is good. Not great. Just good. It’s certainly better than average, since average was a much bigger loss.
But it’s semantics. We need to do better regardless.