cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agoThe "economy"lemmy.mlimagemessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1898arrow-down110cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1888arrow-down1imageThe "economy"lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square23linkfedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoDecreasing the rate of loss is good. Not great. Just good. It’s certainly better than average, since average was a much bigger loss. But it’s semantics. We need to do better regardless.
Decreasing the rate of loss is good. Not great. Just good. It’s certainly better than average, since average was a much bigger loss.
But it’s semantics. We need to do better regardless.