• 7EP6vuI@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    they would have created borders in a way, that one country always consists of two nations/tribes that don’t like each other.

    the map simply shows straightened borders for existing countries…

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Colonization 101.

        You, the colonizer, land on an island with three tribes. Call them Lions, Tigers, and Bears. The Lions are 50% of the population, and control 80% of the wealth. The Tigers are 40% of the population and control 15% of the wealth. The Bears are 10% of the population and have 5% of the wealth. You recruit the Bears to be your army and promise them 10% of the wealth. They love you because you’ve made them richer than they were before, and they get pay back against the folks who were their enemies forever.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d imagine there’d also be borders set within a given “tribe” where one group’s land was split between different colonizing powers and the different colonies ended up with different governments and possibly languages from one another.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which of course makes identifying borders really hard. This is why they often follow distinct geography features like rivers and mountain ranges, or form a line between distinct features.

      Also never known of an entire continent acting as a single force.