return2ozma@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 24 days ago'Starter homes' cost at least $1 million in over 200 U.S. cities, Zillow data findswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square78linkfedilinkarrow-up1468arrow-down111cross-posted to: housing_bubble_2@lemmy.world
arrow-up1457arrow-down1external-link'Starter homes' cost at least $1 million in over 200 U.S. cities, Zillow data findswww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 24 days agomessage-square78linkfedilinkcross-posted to: housing_bubble_2@lemmy.world
minus-squareAphelion@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·24 days agoTry looking in San Francisco, or any city in the entire Bay Area. You won’t find a 500sq ft shack for less than $800k.
minus-squarepixxelkick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down9·24 days ago3 seconds of looking and I found five houses under 500k. Two of them genuinely look pretty decent too tbh, not even rough looking homes.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·24 days agoAll of them are actually apartments, 530 square feet or less. One doesn’t even have a price listed.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·23 days agoYou jest, but a literal burnt-out shell of a house on a miniscule lot was on sale several years ago for $400k.
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·23 days agoIts a joke of a time. The social contract has collapsed.
Try looking in San Francisco, or any city in the entire Bay Area. You won’t find a 500sq ft shack for less than $800k.
3 seconds of looking and I found five houses under 500k. Two of them genuinely look pretty decent too tbh, not even rough looking homes.
All of them are actually apartments, 530 square feet or less. One doesn’t even have a price listed.
You jest, but a literal burnt-out shell of a house on a miniscule lot was on sale several years ago for $400k.
Its a joke of a time. The social contract has collapsed.