• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Basically, what did they think was going to happen when the Supreme Court game him Carte Blanka powers to do whatever he wanted.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      The thing is that they didn’t. If I understood the Supreme Court decision, what they did was saying that official actions of the head of state have to be tried by the legislature and not the courts, which is a common arrangement in other countries. The Congress is the one writing blank checks by refusing to impeach and convict Presidents based on party politics.

      • BuelldozerA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Ding ding! You got it!

        This mess with Trump is another symptom of our Congress being more intent on taking bribes campaign donations and retaining their personal power than handling the business of the nation.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not to mention an “official act” likely can’t be defined as intentionally ignoring the supreme courts ruling. Not only can Congress file impeachment and the Senate remove him, I don’t see how they couldn’t charge him with treason for doing so. Will they, no. But it should be fully within the parameters of what the supreme Court ruled

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yet fuckhead McConnell said that trump needed to be tried in court, not in Congress via impeachment. If neither branch will step up, it’s carte blanche and the game is over.