• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    You think the 90M people that couldn’t be bothered to vote against fascism are going to take to the streets and fight?

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      4 days ago

      Electoral voting is useless and built to disenfranchise and demotivate people participating from politics. Doing direct action immediately improves your life and builds mutual aid networks. So yes.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          49
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You would get a fascist dictator regardless. That has always been the inevitable path of liberal electoral politics under capitalism.

            • Libra00@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              36
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              They aren’t saying do nothing, they’re saying do something more useful than voting.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                20
                arrow-down
                22
                ·
                4 days ago

                And I’m saying not voting is how we got fascism. There were 13M more people that did nothing, than all 77M people who voted for Trump. I don’t expect them to fight unless personally attacked.

                That leaves the ~78M people that collectively voted against Trump. Then remove the sick, disabled, elderly, government, military, and police. We’re not getting anywhere with force unless we can engage the 90M people who couldn’t be inconvenienced to put pen to paper to stop fascism.

                • Libra00@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  25
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Oh, are you under the impression that there’s a group of liberals (as in liberalism in general) out there that doesn’t coddle and appease and enable fascism that I could vote for? Because Democrats are putting up the most token of resistance at best, and meanwhile voting in support of the right’s shenanigans in congress. Schumer voted for the budget, 4 others voted just the other day for a bill that would effectively disenfranchise millions of women, etc.

                  If you walk into a voting booth and find someone holding a bomb who insists that your only choice for how to deal with it is to choose between a long fuse or a short one, the only sane thing to do is to say ‘Good luck with that’ and leave before you get caught in the blast radius. I voted blue for 30 years and it didn’t get me less fascism, why do you imagine it would suddenly start working today? The fascism is coming from inside the house.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              39
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Don’t put words in my mouth. I suggest the opposite of “doing nothing”. Voting is doing nothing every 4 years and expecting things to improve in the face of 100 years of evidence to the contrary.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                I insist that you’re incorrect, based on the simple fact that 77M people voted for a fascist dictator and now we have a fascist dictator. Clearly voting does something, or we wouldn’t have a fascist dictator for president.

                • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Kinda ignores the reality that the past 3 election cycles have been fascist vs. a party that positions itself as progressive “not fascists.” You’d think that, you know. The “not fascists” would’ve done something to prevent the fascists from gaining power.

                  Instead, they endorsed international colonialism and genocide and spent 4 years fighting back against workers’ rights.

                  Electoral liberalism trends towards the right over time. As a rule. Because capitalist interests are always further to the right, and electoral liberalism is based on capitalism and the existence of a capitalist ruling class. Any ideology that permits the existence of capitalism must include very strong limits on capitalist enterprise and absolute bans on capital political power and influence. Or, by default, it becomes more fascist over time. Anti-capitalism is the only ideology congruent with antifascism.

            • Fingolfinz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              They stated a fact, that not defeatism. WTF is with people getting mad at the messenger all the time

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Can you point to a single US election where the half the country that never votes magically showed up to vote?

      If not maybe don’t rely on a group of people that will never participate.