• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Yep.

    A graduated tax structure is evidently just literally too complex for about half the population to understand.

    Throw ‘how is Social Security funded’ into that as well.

    The top bracket is 176,000 and everything above that.

    All it would take to keep Soc Sec funded is just add more brackets after that.

    But nope, America is full of morons who think that their dumb ass making 40k or 80k is going to see a higher tax bill if you explicitly only additionally tax those making stupendous amounts of money.

    • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Had an ex try and convince me that taking overtime pay instead of banking hours would net me less money for the same reason.

      • GoodLuckToFriends
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That can happen, depending on your company’s payment software. One place I worked at would calculate the expected tax burden based on the highest paycheck you made, so if you worked 50% overtime (thus making 175% of your normal paycheck), it would be placing you in a way higher tax bracket for the rest of the year, and you’d have to reclaim it all in the refund when you did your taxes.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        The only scenario I can imagine that making sense in is if you are getting SSI or SSDI and the overtime you exceed the threshold to keep receiving benefits, but would not exceed the actual SSI benefit itself.

        Or for SNAP or TANF or something.

        … the only other scenario I can think of is your ex is commiting tax fraud.

        … or they can’t understand middle school level math… =[