That’s not true. You’ve openly admitted you only accept corporate or western government sources. The same ones pushing the propaganda you like.
And if it’s an outlet that challenges your narrative, you say it’s not a legitimate source. So it’s this endless feedback loop of trying to prove CIA narratives with you pointing to either the government story, or the news laundering it, with this self-reinforcing nonsense.
No amount of linking to accounts from journalists on the ground or involved in negotiations, or CIA documents revealing hoaxes, has ever budged you an inch or convinced you to question your worldview. Evidence doesn’t work on astroturfers.
Jeffrey Sachs isn’t ‘just some rando blogger.’ And the State Dept and CIA have openly admitted they don’t have the evidence to back the claims you’re making (maybe you should join and share your info with them), and US documents & cables have been leaked backing China’s version of events you still deny.
But you believe MSNBC’s version more than firsthand accounts and leaked US cables.
Thank you for portraying the behavior I’ve accused you of directly in this thread. That’ll save people reading from having to go through your profile to see the madness.
I find it fascinating that at no point did you link or even mention him until now or “these leaked cables” and yet you still don’t link anything. Almost as if you’re banking on people not googling him or something and just believing you outright 🤔
Not at all. I’ve linked the same cables to you before, and you dismiss them. Once I get to a stopping point at work, I’ll come back with the links and previous comments. Or they can look them up on Wikileaks themselves.
I would love for people to look up what Jeffrey Sachs has to say on Ukraine. The guy has been on the ground investigating, and directly involved in negotiations. He is absolutely an authority on the subject.
That’s not true. You’ve openly admitted you only accept corporate or western government sources. The same ones pushing the propaganda you like.
And if it’s an outlet that challenges your narrative, you say it’s not a legitimate source. So it’s this endless feedback loop of trying to prove CIA narratives with you pointing to either the government story, or the news laundering it, with this self-reinforcing nonsense.
No amount of linking to accounts from journalists on the ground or involved in negotiations, or CIA documents revealing hoaxes, has ever budged you an inch or convinced you to question your worldview. Evidence doesn’t work on astroturfers.
Ah yes, the classic CIA this and CIA that, sorry if I don’t accept randosblog.blogspot.com or totallyalegitjournalist.substack.com anybody can start a blog and say whatever they want
How can one accept what you say when you glorify dictators, openly handwaved away “reeducation” camps, caught editing headlines to subtlety push aganda and allow known propaganda outlets and when someone says something about it, they’re censored. Hell you guys even deny Taiwan as being a country and everyone against you is just some form of paid agent
Jeffrey Sachs isn’t ‘just some rando blogger.’ And the State Dept and CIA have openly admitted they don’t have the evidence to back the claims you’re making (maybe you should join and share your info with them), and US documents & cables have been leaked backing China’s version of events you still deny.
But you believe MSNBC’s version more than firsthand accounts and leaked US cables.
Thank you for portraying the behavior I’ve accused you of directly in this thread. That’ll save people reading from having to go through your profile to see the madness.
I find it fascinating that at no point did you link or even mention him until now or “these leaked cables” and yet you still don’t link anything. Almost as if you’re banking on people not googling him or something and just believing you outright 🤔
Not at all. I’ve linked the same cables to you before, and you dismiss them. Once I get to a stopping point at work, I’ll come back with the links and previous comments. Or they can look them up on Wikileaks themselves.
I would love for people to look up what Jeffrey Sachs has to say on Ukraine. The guy has been on the ground investigating, and directly involved in negotiations. He is absolutely an authority on the subject.