• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    maybe you should tell me what your narrative is then

    Exactly what the 196 mods said, if you’d bothered to read literally any of the stickied posts that came up at the time. There was disagreement with the admins over how to moderate 196, especially regarding ban lengths and presumption of good faith.

    But of course, you didn’t read any of it. You made up a narrative that you suited your pre-existing biases, and proceed to spread it even though, but your own admission, you didn’t follow the issue - apparently at all. Of course, you also claimed that you don’t use 196 despite having been banned from 196, so maybe you aren’t the most reliable narrator. :)

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      you also claimed that you don’t use 196 despite having been banned from 196, so maybe you aren’t the most reliable narrator.

      it’s called /all I hadn’t bothered the block the new 196 so it showed up, I commented because I took it as some earnestly asking for advice, rather than a cj thread

      There was disagreement with the admins over how to moderate 196, especially regarding ban lengths and presumption of good faith

      wonder what the good faith issue was 🤔

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        it’s called /all I hadn’t bothered the block the new 196 so it showed up, I commented because I took it as some earnestly asking for advice, rather than a cj thread

        And then proceeded to complain about the ban in YePowerTrippingBastards, citing the 196 sidebar rules in your complaint. Clearly you had no clue where you were. :)