• javiwhite@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “prior to the training the dogs were known to only walk, hop, skip and amble through forests…”

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Do you have a link to info about this story? Sounds cool and obviously people are interested to know more from the comments.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Not an expert on this but…

    Forests usually recover just fine after a fire. They’re a natural process after all. You don’t need to go throw seeds around to help it recover.

    Of course, with the advent of climate change that’s no longer true in all cases, with drier areas burning hotter than previously and destroying old growth forests.

    The thing is, you can’t just throw around “big old tree” seeds - you raise seedlings / saplings and then plant them in appropriate places.

    Additionally, even if you were trying to spread seeds around, IDK whether a dog could achieve an even or even a random spread. Unpredictable yes, but not random.

    So, cute dogs and stuff, bit I think this is a pretty niche application and not often required in forestry.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, also I don’t know if they are biologists/foresters but hopefully they use native or at least compatible seeds for the areas. There are lots of grass types which can become invasive and destroy habitat for the local wildlife if they use the wrong species.

      Where I live we just use helicopters, and mostly only because it’s mountainous so we want to establish the grass back as quickly as possible before the rain hits and washes all the soil away into the rivers.

    • CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I didn’t read the article, so correct me if I’m wrong, but the title says “plant seeds” not “tree seeds”, so it’s probably a variety of plants. And my guess is none of them are “tree seeds”, not only for the reasons you already stated, but also for the simple fact that “tree seeds” are too big for the bags those dogs are carrying in the thumbnail.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah I got a bit side tracked talking about how fires have been more intense in recent years and now “big, old, trees” are dying in fires where they didn’t in the past.

        Still, and I don’t know how applicable this is to other places, but here in Australia fires are an important part of plant life cycles.

        First Nations people used to burn areas for a variety of reasons, one of which is that it would attract marsupials in the coming weeks and days coming to eat the new shoots bursting through the ground after a fire. So you could burn an area within walking distance from your camp, and over the next few weeks have a ready herd of kangaroos hanging around from which to cull a few.

        Not really relevant but firehawks aparently spread fires. Also a lot of Australian plants are stimulated to germinate after being exposed to heat and smoke.

        I guess my point is, spreading seeds after a fire isn’t a problem that needs solving. Fire is a natural process and the bush generally bounces right back quicker than you’d expect.

          • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ok well, I’m sure these dogs will be incredibly useful in California and one wonders how it didn’t turn into a dusty wasteland without them.

            As an aside, Australia is a big place mate. Some areas have loads of rain some have none.

    • notthebees@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Could be used as a way to prevent erosion on hillsides. The plants will die out once native species are established. They just have to hold on to the soil for the native species to grow.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know the details, but this kind of restoration sounds problematic. The safest way is to let the natural seed bank work. To bring seeds from somewhere else means to mix different genotypes, which can lead to the loss of some of the genotypes naturally occuring there. I hope they thought this through properly - the whole case might be rather interesting.

    • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They’re not necessarily seeds from other places. Could be from 500 meters away. But it’ll speed things up a bit, maybe stop some soil erosion from happening by skipping a season or two of barren land.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Seems wildly inefficient, but we haven’t seen it in action nor seen the results after a year or three.

      • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Reminds me of those “wholesome” stories about little Bobby and his elementary school class fixing the environment by doing something the government is responsible for.