FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 个月前Move the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square241linkfedilinkarrow-up11.86Karrow-down124file-text
arrow-up11.84Karrow-down1imageMove the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneFundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 个月前message-square241linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 个月前Quick search shows that the Prohibition Party was established in 1868 and Prohibition was enacted in 1919. About 50 years later. Greens were established in 2001. I guess that means you’re willing to wait another 25 years for any substantive change. Also, it’s pretty funny that you can pay attention to the Prohibition Party and ignore the idea of vote splitting.
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前the fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 个月前You get funnier and funnier. I literally lol’d that one.
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前if you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 个月前This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ You just keep getting funnier and funnier. btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 个月前 This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 个月前Now who is acting petulant?
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 个月前Sure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to. You’re a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas. You are talented and well-respected in your community. Need any more affirmations? After all the laughter you’ve given me, I feel like giving something back.
Quick search shows that the Prohibition Party was established in 1868 and Prohibition was enacted in 1919. About 50 years later.
Greens were established in 2001. I guess that means you’re willing to wait another 25 years for any substantive change.
Also, it’s pretty funny that you can pay attention to the Prohibition Party and ignore the idea of vote splitting.
the fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.
You get funnier and funnier. I literally lol’d that one.
if you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’
You just keep getting funnier and funnier.
btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
Now who is acting petulant?
correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance
Sure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to.
You’re a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas.
You are talented and well-respected in your community.
Need any more affirmations?
After all the laughter you’ve given me, I feel like giving something back.