If U.S. President Donald Trump fails in his stated goal of annexing Canada through economic force, what would happen if he ordered the world’s most powerful military to invade?

Some experts and academics say it’s a notion too preposterous to even contemplate. But Aisha Ahmad isn’t one of them.

“When you look at the power (imbalance) between the U.S. and Canada, an invasion would immediately result in the defeat of the Canadian Armed Forces,” said the University of Toronto political science professor, who last month published an essay on the subject in The Conversation.

“But a conventional military victory is not the end of this story. It’s just the beginning.”

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      I feel like this has to be the case. America is a disaster but I cannot fathom the populace or even the military being complacent as they march over the border.

      • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Look up Kent state shootings. They fired on their own. The people in the military are maybe there for an education but mainly to get paid and some to shoot people. They’ll have no issue attacking us at all.

        If it comes to that, those that would have an issue will have left on their own or been purged by that point.

  • imvii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 days ago

    The modern US hasn’t fought a war with someone right next door, who looks and talks like them. Not only would it be hard to hold captured cities, but I think many Canadian fighters would walk across that massive unsecured border and start fucking up US resources like electrical stations, water supplies, subway systems, internet backbones, government buildings, . It is super easy to buy guns and ammo in the US, bombs are not hard to make. We would have a fair amount of local support as well.

    We Canadians could just walk around the US in public and you’ve never know it.

      • pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        Blue states understand that you can’t just go and TAKE a country’s sovereignty, and that trying to do so sets a dangerous precedent.

        Red states seem to forget that it goes both ways. Another country can try to TAKE the US (e.g., Russia, china).

        Red states seem to forget that they would be furious if another country tried to invade the US. They fail to look in the mirror.

      • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Honestly you would have to go county by county. As someone from MN, there are rural areas that vote red and would probably be for war with canada if it came down to it.

        Then cities and people in blue counties would probably be the opposite.

        • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          While true, I think people would easily drive a few counties to sabotage an invasion force, which blurs the map. I would consider the state level about even

          • imvii@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            There would also be civilian targets. Those huge retirement towns filled with MAGA boomers in Florida - the ones where they drive golf carts around - those will burn to the ground.

    • TylerBourbon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not to mention so very many of the Americans in the states that border Canada would probably be more than willing to aid the Canadian efforts.

    • Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s stupid because a lot of Americans have families in Canada and some Americans actually live in Canada and loads of American businesses have offices and branches in Canada so they’d literally be bombing themselves.

    • Cyclist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sabotaging the Canadian power stations that send power to the Eastern Seaboard would be a start.

    • Justus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Canadians were known as the most ruthless wartime force. I will bring that back to protect my daughters right to her body. Our neighbour should never mistake kindness for weakness

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It would another Vietnam or Afghanistan. They’d invade, kill a few thousand maybe million people, mire around, and then retreat again with their funds drained and thousands of crippled veterans with PTSD.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    decades long is an understatement. unless they mean the US itself will collapse

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Maybe not collapse, but they sure as hell won’t ‘win’.

      In a recent article published in The Atlantic magazine, (American military historian Eliot) Cohen used a tongue-in-cheek approach to warn Americans against invading Canada, pointing out that previous attempts led to dismal results.

      His review of American military failures starts in 1775, when U.S. troops invaded Quebec, where they distributed pamphlets — translated into French — awkwardly declaring: “You have been conquered into liberty.” The campaign ended in disastrous defeat for the American Continental Army in December 1775.

      During the War of 1812, former U.S. president Thomas Jefferson said conquering Canada was “a mere matter of marching.”

      “This was incorrect,” Cohen wrote. “The United States launched eight or nine invasions of Canada during the War of 1812, winning only one fruitless battle. The rest of the time, it got walloped.”

      • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        There was a certain light colored house that got lit on fire by retaliatory forces back in 1812.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This being something to talk about is fucking incredible.

      They’ve gone completely off.

  • riyehn@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t know why everyone assumes the use of military force to annex Canada would take the form of a massive conventional invasion. Hybrid warfare approaches like spreading misinformation, covert ops, stirring up local pro-American militias, etc. could do 95% of the work, without the sort of overt violence that generates insurgencies.

    It’s very possible to defend against hybrid threats, but only if we recognize the threat exists instead of assuming a US invasion would necessarily be a catastrophic strategic blunder.

  • Mallspice@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Because going to war with people who like the cold is always a good idea.

    Smh

  • Ilixtze@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Come on USA : Invade Canada during winter and kneel under the barrage of exploding hockey pocks.

  • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    If conservatives ever get insane enough to actually try anything like that, understand that a fair amount of that hypothetical insurgency will be happening on the American side of the border as well. A lot of people who live near the border have a lot of Canadian ties. They would effectively consider any military action taken against Canada to be an attack on them.