• Rivalarrival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 个月前

    Shooting the messenger is not strategically sound.

    She’s not the messenger. She is the speaker. Here, she is attempting to exert her own brand of political influence.

    Her political influence is largely responsible for the sorry state of the Democratic party today.

    Whatever message needs to be sent, someone else can send it.

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 个月前

      If you think Hillary Clinton is “largely responsible” for the state of the Democratic Party, you’ve not been paying attention. It’s not as though they were populist just up until 2016.

      • Rivalarrival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 个月前

        She has been a major player in the party since the 90s. She is, indeed, largely responsible for the current state of the party.

        • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 个月前

          Yes, she obviously was a major player. But she didn’t engineer the rightward lurch as you claim. Again, I don’t much care for her, but the GOP talking points for decades as though she was somehow the one pulling the strings was effective.

          • Rivalarrival
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 个月前

            Again, I don’t much care for her,

            Who do you care for? Let’s spend a little more time on people who actually matter.

              • Rivalarrival
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 个月前

                Yeah?

                Check out the rest of the comments in this thread. Getting a lot of insightful and innovative policy discourse from your post?

                If you care about policy, you’ll avoid any mention of that person in the future. As soon as her name is mentioned, the policy conversation ends.

              • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 个月前

                There is no such thing.

                The person is the one who pursues, builds, and implements policy. A bad person will not be a good ally, no matter their professed policy beliefs, because it is only integrity that binds a politician to work for their constituents once elected.

                Without a good person, you have no way to trust that good policy will follow.