If rolled out widely, this would make web browsers and third-party YouTube clients without a DRM license unusable for YouTube playback, download, etc. This would include almost all open-source web browsers and almost all third-party YouTube clients. Archive link to reddit post about this

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    How to kill YouTube in one stupid step.

    I guess their CEO wasn’t paying attention when the music industry got trounced by pirating.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why would it kill YouTube?

      Spotify has DRM for all of their songs, it has not killed music streaming.

      What this actually does is make it formally illegal to rip YouTube videos (circumventing DRM is against DMCA). It’s also a shot against youtube-dlp, which refuses to cross the line of cracking the DRM, which would be doable, but they don’t want to on account of the legal issue.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Probably not going to kill it, but the number of users and view counts will drop dramatically. The idea is, that it cuts all deadweight users, which reduces Google’s expenses.

        Everyone who is allergic to ads, will leave and find their video entertainment elsewhere. As far as those users are concerned, YT will be dead to them.

        Those who remain, will either pay up, or have ads shoved down their throats. Line goes up, and shareholders are happy. The money must flow.

        As the enshittification of YT has marched towards its terminal stage, many youtubers have already prepared for it by migrating their videos to other platforms. YT doesn’t like tits, so those videos had to go to Onlyfans, Justforfans or whatever. YT doesn’t like guns, so those videos went to Pepperbox. YT doesn’t like providing a steady income to anyone, so many videos went to Nebula. Then there’s also palces like Floatplane, Locals, Playeur etc. I’m sure there are lots of other video platforms too. The way I see it, YT can die, and the fragmented video landscape will only thrive as a result.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sure, but I still think yall are really overestimating how many people will actually care. You might need to reevaluate your bias. The average person will definitely not change apps or websites. Maybe 1% of users will care to find an alternative for their video needs. And even then, some videos are only on YouTube.

          • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Oh, but here’s the thing. YT is already abusing the people who make the videos. Many of them are already using YT as a platform for promoting their real video platform. They will only upload advertisers friendly watered down versions and mention at the end that if you want to see the real one, head over to one of the countless other platforms they’ve built over the years. All of that is already happening, and it can become a significant factor in the future.

            Will it though? Who knows. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

            If it does, it means that more and more people will migrate to the real video platforms where they can watch the uncut version of every video. I think there’s real potential to shift the video consumption culture from one ad supported platform that abuses everyone involved to several paid platforms, that treat everyone much better.

            • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Youtubers have complained about YT being a horrible landlord for so many years, and yet they can’t leave. They keep trying, but very few succeeded. It’s a shitty situation, but that’s where the audience and the money are.

              • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                But now the more edgy videos are gone and the watch time that is attached to them. If you want to watch something that is too spicy for YT, you have to do so somewhere else. The fragmentation has already started.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          DRM in the video feed would allow encrypted ads in the videos, and effectively break normal ad blockers.

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Only if there was no client-side decoration/measurement code/links etc to denote that an ad is playing, which there will always be.

            It’s basically no different from having in-stream ads today.

            • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s very different. It’s not as trivial as you paint it. They can make it as hard as they want to detect.

              • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I’m not making it out to be trivial, but I am realistic about the matter.

                You can have in-stream ads to make things ‘unblockable’, but only so long as there’s no other side effects. Any side effects can be detected, that’s really just the reality of the matter.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Nah, maybe some people will switch ad blockers off, but for most, the msin takeaway will be to look for a competing service.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Other entertainment. If Youtube makes my head hurt, I’ll go touch grass, watch a movie, read some news, play boardgames, etc.

            And if one can’t get out of their phone, then there is Tiktok I guess.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            And you vastly underestimate the value Youtube would lose if the tech-savvy segment of their audience went elsewhere.

            Those left behind are a different market. Youtube creators would have to dumb themselves down even further, driving even more worthwhile content off the service. Soon Youtube would be the Facebook of video sites, geared towards a shrinking population of people too old and stubborn to move on.

            I say YT should absolutely shoot themselves in the foot like this.

      • octoblade@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If they were to force a TEE based DRM like Widevine L1, it would likely cause significant issues as there are a considerable amount of devices that don’t support it (for example most PCs).

        If they were to use software based DRM like Widevine L3, it would be easy for enthusiasts to crack and the tools for doing so would just get much much better.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      98
      ·
      8 days ago

      They went and paid for Spotify.

      Like most heavy users of YTP. YouTube will be just fine. Y’all just freeloaders. Pay you cheap bastards.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        7 days ago

        Already paid in personal data before I was smart enough to try and close the faucet, I don’t see why I should pay more

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          7 days ago

          Because prices change. You can stop using it if you don’t feel the value is there.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 days ago

            Alright, so is my current data worth more or less than my old data? Is my old data worth more or less today than, say, 3 years ago? I don’t see a reason to pay if Google refuses to let people know how much they are worth to them, first.

            • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              7 days ago

              YouTube was acting a loss leader for years.

              Your data has increased in value since then, so has the cost to run the service. These things aren’t some mutually exclusive bubble. This is not how businesses are run, certainly not public traded companies. Many consumers do find the value in a $22/mo video + music sub. We use it a lot.

              I have no expectations of a free experience and I get nearly all my families entertainment media via a single subscription. If they raise it beyond my expectations I will steal it or look elsewhere depending on the quality of the content at that time.

              But for now, it’s a fantastic service.

      • Siratonin@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’d happily pay if youtube stopped falsley demonitizing all the creators I watch. I refuse to give money to copyright trolls. If I pay youtube then youtube just hands a portion of that money to copyright trolls, no questions asked.