If rolled out widely, this would make web browsers and third-party YouTube clients without a DRM license unusable for YouTube playback, download, etc. This would include almost all open-source web browsers and almost all third-party YouTube clients. Archive link to reddit post about this

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    DRM in the video feed would allow encrypted ads in the videos, and effectively break normal ad blockers.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Only if there was no client-side decoration/measurement code/links etc to denote that an ad is playing, which there will always be.

      It’s basically no different from having in-stream ads today.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s very different. It’s not as trivial as you paint it. They can make it as hard as they want to detect.

        • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m not making it out to be trivial, but I am realistic about the matter.

          You can have in-stream ads to make things ‘unblockable’, but only so long as there’s no other side effects. Any side effects can be detected, that’s really just the reality of the matter.