Summary

Elon Musk blamed trans people for recent Tesla attacks after his daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson, called him a “pathetic man-child.”

Musk shared false data on trans violence and claimed hormone therapy causes volatility. He linked trans identity to attacks on Tesla cars and dealerships, citing unverified reports of trans suspects.

Musk’s comments followed Wilson’s interview where she condemned his far-right shift and disavowed responsibility for his views.

Critics accused Musk of scapegoating trans people amid Tesla’s financial decline and political controversies.

  • theshoeshiner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Terrorism is the act of using violence or intimidation for political gain/control.

    That’s exactly what their motivation is.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      a lot of people kill people for political reasons, doesn’t make that terrorism. There’s a specific branch of intentionally inciting terror with the use of violence FOR political means, that’s actually defined as terrorism.

      Burning teslas at dealerships probably doesn’t count. Extorting people and threatening to kill them, might count.

      • theshoeshiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The violence wasn’t simply for political reasons, as you suggest. It is to accomplish political goals by causing fear and terror in people associated with that brand. That seems like terrorism to me.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              wdym? The only reason people would do that is because they’re unhappy with tesla, and how it’s operating as a company. Given that musk is a figurehead in company, he’s the only reason it’s political.

              Musk is just a shitty person, people don’t like that, and are retaliating as they see fit.

              • theshoeshiner@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                sigh

                Musk is a government employee and spends much of his time with the most powerful political figure in this hemisphere.

                Attacking him and his property is an inherently political act.

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  and tesla is a private company that he owns? Elon in the government, and elon that runs tesla are two unrelated things.

                  Sure people are motivated against elon due to his political advancements, specifically those made INTO government.

                  But tesla is STILL a private company, that isn’t even under the ownership of musk, it’s a board of directors. At best this is property destruction and arson.

                  Otherwise you’re arguing very quickly that ANY private entity is immediately therefore a protected subspecies of the US federal government, and any action taken against it, is by definition, terrorism.