Summary

U.S. barley farmers face mounting financial pressure as Trump’s tariffs spark fears of losing key export markets.

Canada, the top importer of U.S. malt barley, has already imposed retaliatory tariffs, and Mexico may follow. Farmers warn that rising fertilizer and chemical costs, combined with declining U.S. beer consumption, threaten their survival.

Breweries may absorb or pass higher costs to consumers, potentially raising beer prices.

Experts say tariffs could devastate barley exports, with industry leaders calling them a major blow to struggling American farmers.

  • tal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Experts say tariffs could devastate barley exports, with industry leaders calling them a major blow to struggling American farmers.

    US barley production at a county level:

    And the Trump-Harris results for the 2024 Presidential election at a county level:

    I mean, this one is kind of a self-inflicted wound.

    EDIT: Well, there’s Glacier County, Montana. But even there, it looks like this was an unusually Republican election. That is, it wasn’t tariff concerns driving this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacier_County,_Montana

    Glacier County is located in the U.S. state of Montana. As of the 2020 census, the population was 13,778.[1] The county is located in northwestern Montana between the Great Plains and the Rocky Mountains, known to the Blackfeet as the “Backbone of the World”. The county is geographically and culturally diverse and includes the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, Glacier National Park, and Lewis and Clark National Forest.

    Owing largely to its majority Native American population, Glacier County generally votes strongly Democratic, in contrast with most other rural Montana counties, which trend Republican. Democratic strength lies in the western and central portions of the county in the Blackfeet Reservation, including the city of Browning. However, the eastern portion of the county, including Cut Bank, votes strongly Republican. In most recent elections, Glacier has been the most Democratic county in the state.

    In the 2024 election, Glacier county saw a shift toward the Republican party, the strongest such shift of all Montana counties. This mirrored other counties in Montana with high Native American populations, such as Blaine, Roosevelt and Big Horn, which all flipped or leaned more Republican after 2020. While Kamala Harris still easily won the county, this was the first time that Glacier County voted to the right of Missoula County since 1980.[7]

    EDIT2: Updated barley map; original one lacked data for some states.

      • tal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        It looks like your barley production map is better. Apparently mine only has data for some states.

        Looks like it still shows the same pattern, though.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Every time I start to think that maybe there’s hope, that the working class might unify against this type of shit, I see another post taking delight in the suffering of others because they happened to vote for the red party that’s fucking them, instead of the blue one that’s allowing them to be fucked.

      • tal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I see another post taking delight

        At no point did I say anywhere that this was a delight.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I will say it’s somewhat satisfying in an “I told you so” kind of way. It’s getting really frustrating voting for a government that will serve the people overall, but get rejected by the very people who would benefit most.

          I will continue to vote for sanity and for a government that serves its people but is it really too much to ask for the people to do the same?

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You’re asking people to show kindness to their abusers. The people who voted for this have caused massive suffering. People have tried being the more mature ones, look where it got us. Those people are not interested in joining forces. The openly call us the enemy. Asking people to give them sympathy at this point is insulting.

  • Lemmist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I suppose they need more tariffs. There is nothing in the USA that can’t be fixed with some tariffs and a paragraph from the Bible. Land of Glory.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They should have included a picture of beer, instead of a couple cans of piss water and diluted piss water

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        A lot of the mass produced beer brands are made with a mix of barley malt and rice. And while other low-alcoholic beverages have traditionally been made with a malt base, many of them (especially alcoholic seltzers) are just fermenting cane sugar syrup these days because it’s cheaper and has less flavor to cover up.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Malt liquor? Alcohol made with malted barley…

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malt_liquor

          In other countries, things like “Smirnoff Ice” actually contain vodka. In the US, they can’t do that for whatever reason, so it’s all malt liquor plus flavoring. Which is why they all kind of taste the same in a subtle way.

          I guess most of them probably contain high fructose corn syrup, so maybe not completely wrong about the corn.

          Edit: Actually, just peeked at that wiki page and I guess corn is often use in addition to malted barley. TIL.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Damn, not as many people pouring literal poison down their throats now that weed’s legal for most people, huh? Something something world’s smallest violin. Fuck you, alcohol industry.

    • Sestren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The culture around beer shifted from cheap low alcohol content drinks with little variation, to more expensive high alcohol content drinks with a ton of variation. Then, as with anything that hits a “trend”, the market tries to capitalize on it beyond what demand actually cares to express, and prices go so far through the roof that nobody gives a shit anymore.

      Nobody that was already drinking cares about the health issues (or at least they didn’t just suddenly change out of the blue). They just got a taste for something that gradually got priced out. If you got your taste for beers on fancy 10%ABV stouts that now cost $7 a can/bottle, you aren’t going to just buy whatever is now in your price range. You just stop buying beer, and get other shit.

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I feel that. I love fancy crazy beers, but the prices are getting outrageous nowadays. Theres a four pack of cans that looks interesting at my local grocery store, but it’s almost 15 dollars for the privilege.

        Do you know what I like even more than fancy beer? Not getting screwed and taken advantage of. At the end of the day, beer isn’t even healthy for me anyways–the choice to slow down or stop is no problem at all tbh.

        • Sestren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          15 is affordable by me. Highest I’ve seen is $33 for a 4 pack. Might as well just go out to a bar at that point.

          Some of them feel like they are almost worth the expense. Founders makes some amazing beer of all varieties, and the Goose Island Bourbon County stouts are all phenomenal… But then there’s shit like Southern Tier trying to sell yet another stupid twist on a flavor nobody has ever done for $5 more than last year’s variety. It’s just pointless to engage in it now. Better off enjoying cheap wine.

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Great insight, and really this is emblematic of the idiotic hyper-focus on growth, as much and as quickly as possible. It’s always better for society and broader stakeholders if growth happens organically. Growth should happen to satisfy growing demand, it should not be forced to go as fast as possible because there’s ridiculous money to be made by getting in early and inflating demand.

        Every damn thing “investors” get a fuckin whiff of they ruin this way, housing being probably the worst (repeat!) offender. We have to figure out how to disincentivize this behavior. It guarantees toxic trash for industries in their wake and just further enriches the worst among us.

        Edit: clarity

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It’s all about financialization. Money people don’t care about product fundamentals anymore, they care about line go up.

          Craft beer looked like a perfect investment because it was already a premium product with social caché (that incidentally was also addictive). But as the above comment notes, there isn’t an endless appetite for overpriced beer, especially when the market is flooded with shitty imitations from mass market beer companies.

          The way to disincentivize it would be to let interest rates skyrocket (financialization only works if the cost of borrowing is effectively zero) but that would hurt regular people first and worst.

          We could also vote in a socialist government who was willing to do things like seize corporate-owned housing and piss on the corpse of companies like Blackrock as their portfolios lose a significant percentage of their value but that seems remarkably unlikely.

          • Benjaben@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Couldn’t agree more. There is no solution to this exploitative pattern that doesn’t involve drastically curtailing the profits made by participating in the pattern. The details matter obviously, but the situation is really that simple. There’s no solution for us that doesn’t require ending the rewards of this behavior for them.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It doesn’t help that alternatives have been lowering their prices. For example Wine prices have been decreasing due to a large amount of over-production. When a can of fancy beer cost $7 and a decent bottle of wine cost $9-12, economics wins out.

        Oh and south central Washington (Yakima valley) is taking a beating on Hop prices. Most of those expensive beers have a lot of hops in their recipes. Add in they are highly dependent on immigrant labor and they are truly fucked for the next few years.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They said less beer, not less alcohol.

      As someone who has enjoyed cannabis daily for likely longer than you’ve been alive, there is nothing more annoying than the “all drugs are bad except weed, which is a gift from God” people.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Dude, I don’t use cannabis or alcohol. I have no personal stake in this game. I care about this solely from a public health perspective and acknowledge that 1) cannabis is substantially less unhealthy than alcohol and 2) cannabis legalization correlates with a decrease in alcohol sales. I don’t care how long you’ve been alive; being alive longer isn’t an argument, so quit being condescending and piss off.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Oh good, it was meant to be condescending. Glad it came across. I don’t recall ever saying you did use either.

          Even here you couldn’t help yourself and had to post articles about this shit. Buddy, I KNOW.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            They said less beer, not less alcohol

            So I gave you an article showing that cannabis legalization also corresponds with a decrease in alcohol in general, not just beer.

            Buddy, I KNOW.

            You’re strawmanning what I’m saying as “all drugs are bad except weed, which is a gift from God”, so I gave you something more concrete (health information) that you can’t strawman to fuck and back. That’s why I linked to both articles. Hope this accommodation to your illiteracy helps. :)