• Rivalarrival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Basically, the EPA has been saying “we don’t care what you actually release, so long as the water you release it into is at least [this] clean” after you do it." With this approach, the city has to monitor the water, and they become responsible for whatever anybody dumps in the water anywhere, even outside the city’s jurisdiction. When a cruise ship dumps its sewage tanks overboard 30 miles up current, the city is responsible for that dumping, even though they have no jurisdiction over the ship.

    The court said this isn’t acceptable. They said the EPA - not the city - is responsible for the water. The EPA must specify exactly what can and cannot be released. If they aren’t satisfied with the water quality, they have to tell the city to release less, and/or go after the other entities doing the dumping.

    This ruling is much ado about nothing.

    • NeatoBuilds
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I understood it as the epa can’t enforce how much people dump now?

      • Rivalarrival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No, that’s not true at all. The EPA can still set specific standards on what, when, how much, and how often they can dump.

        They just can’t offload responsibility for ensuring water quality to the dumper: They have to actually enforce their dumping standards.