Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced retaliatory tariffs after Donald Trump confirmed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods and 10% on energy, set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.

Trump justified the move by linking it to fentanyl smuggling concerns.

Trudeau called the tariffs “unjustified” and imposed 25% tariffs on $155 billion in U.S. goods, with $30 billion effective immediately and the rest in 21 days.

He warned of price hikes and job losses in the U.S., arguing the move violates Trump’s own trade agreement from his last term.

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Today I watched both Trudeau and Sheinbaum’s addresses.

    I must say that Americans get even worse reputation everytime Trump and Vance talk even just because of the contrast with some of the best, most prepared speakers and I must say attractive individuals in politics today.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Carry on Prime Minister Trudeau and create better trade deals with the EU, EEC and friendly Asian countries.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Trudeau’s measured retaliation shows Canada won’t back down but prioritizes diplomacy over chaos.

    🐱🐱🐱🐱

  • HRP58@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Tariffs on imports make the imports more expensive and push people to buy non-tariffed goods. This causes the exporting company to lose income from their exports

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Capitalist companies may lose income from lost sales, but they will be raising prices to match the tariff. Probably throw an extra 5-10% on top of that for greed, because they can blame it all on the tariff.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    290
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I like Cory Doctorow’s plan.

    The reason Canada got tariff-free access to sell to the US in the first place? Canada agreed to enforce penalties for tampering with digital locks, following the premise of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act.

    If the US is going back on the deal, then Canada should too. Make it legal to jailbreak all US tech.

    Doctorow advocating for this plan:

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’d be nice if somewhere, other than Russia and China, was doing the important reverse engineering work.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        A surprising amount of ‘American’ media is filmed and produced in Canada. Toronto Vancouver is like Hollywood North. This would probably be a footgun

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        It already basically is; Anti-piracy laws in Canada don’t have a lot of teeth. I leave my torrent computer running 24 hours a day to seed and I don’t even get emails anymore after switching to a smaller service provider.

      • lance20000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I’m not too concerned about that. Their courts are being attacked with so much that I’m pretty sure downloading a car isn’t going to be high on their list.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      If the US is going back on the deal, then Canada should too. Make it legal to jailbreak all US tech.

      That should be considered with plans for further escalation varying from nothing to an embargo.

      Though arguably piracy and jailbreaking are not so bad for said domination. Microsoft practically encouraged piracy in ex-USSR at some point. Piracy solves the availability problem, supports market share, leads to short-term loss in sales but long-term growth.

      But that’s Microsoft, while US government in general seems to think DMCA is for them what the Sound was for the Danish crown in middle ages.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Microsoft practically encouraged piracy in ex-USSR at some point. Piracy solves the availability problem, supports market share, leads to short-term loss in sales but long-term growth.

        Yup, Bill Gates pretty much said he’d rather have people growing up on pirated Microsoft products than use alternatives.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, I caught that one too. He’s a fantastic orator. He’s got an endless arsenal of one-liners.

        I added a link to that and some other instances where he’s made this argument.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They could also make their own play store and apple store, and could charge the developers much lower fees, for the same apps that would work anywhere. It would cost them very little and be nothing but profit.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump is such a vindictive moron. Whether he’s a Russian asset or just a certifiably stupid, the end result is the same.

    Good god I hate this fucking timeline. Fuck corporate America for backing this monster and fuck everyone who voted for him. Fuck the Democrats for collectively shrugging about all this too.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      Whether he’s a Russian asset or just certifiably stupid

      Most definitely both.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, if he was just in it for his own aggrandisement, none of this would make sense. The orders are very clearly coming from Moscow here, because only Putin benefits from all this bullshit.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          And he’s stupid for going along with it - a smart Russian asset US president would get something in return other than a pat on the head.

          • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I mean presumably he’s getting a pile of money. Or there’s kompramat. Or, more likely, both. Also he just likes when people talk to him like he’s special, I’m sure it took the KGB all of 6 seconds to figure that out and take advantage of it

  • Kimmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Excuse my ignorance but wouldn’t that make things more expensive for Canadians as well?

    :edit: thank you all for answering me. I totally understand now.

    Fuck trump

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Yes. It’s alright, I’ve managed to mostly eliminate American products. Anyone smart or at least patriotic has looked into it as well, since the madness began. It was kind of neat watching the US products just sit on the shelves while Canadian stuff emptied out.

      To reiterate what all our politicians have been saying to US media, Trump is raising prices on Americans to hurt us, it’s for no good reason, and we’re forced to do the same on our side.

      • Kaput@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        There is a reason, is just like this old Western movies. The wealth banq/ranch owner that rules the town, is diverting the local stream to dry up the pretty widow a farm. Saying you know you would be much better off marrying me. I would cherish you and add you worthless farm to my ranch. Only he knows the train line is about to be installed and would turn that little plot of land into very valuable real estate. Ducking the widow in the as every night is just bonus.

      • epicstove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Genuine question, if Trump’s tarrifs just make things expensive for Americans why would we put retaliatory tarrifs that effect us?

        Do tarrifs really just make things more expensive for the home country? How do they effect the country the tarrifs are imposed on?

        • Bryce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Trump’s tariffs make Canadian stuff more expensive for Americans, so they’ll tend to buy less Canadian stuff. Without retaliatory tariffs, Americans only buy American stuff, and Canadians continue to buy American stuff, so nobody is buying Canadian stuff. This hurts Canada because nobody is buying their stuff. With retaliatory tariffs, US stuff becomes more expensive in Canada, so it encourages Canadians to stop buying American and spend their money in Canada.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Do tarrifs really just make things more expensive for the home country? How do they effect the country the tarrifs are imposed on?

          It makes it harder for that country to sell. Which means layoffs and loss of asset value there. The most dramatic example is the auto industry. They’re talking about just closing shop immediately, because their business plan depends on moving things back and forth across the border as they gradually get assembled.

          If this goes on as long as I suspect, there will be new businesses that bubble up to use the same resources, but it’s never going to be as nice as a single integrated continent, and in the meanwhile, time is money, things can’t grow and develop while just sitting there. Not to mention the workers that now don’t know how to put food on the table.

          Genuine question, if Trump’s tariffs just make things expensive for Americans why would we put retaliatory tariffs that effect us?

          That’s actually a separate question. It’s a matter of tit-for-tat, partly. But, there’s also the fact that the US government is pocketing all those tariffs. If we didn’t have a bit of extra income to match, I imagine it’d get really hard for the government to pay for things with our now weaker currency. Not retaliating was considered, though.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Imagine widgets are $10 in country A, but a company in country B can make and sell them for $8. Buyers are likely to buy the cheapest (all else being equal). A 100% tariff would turn $8 into $16. Company B still only gets $8, but they now look far more expensive to customers in country A.

          They are designed to price out external competitors to local companies. This can be used to protect industries. Steel is a good example. China can make steel far cheaper than the rest of the world. However, steel plants take a long time to build and get producing. You generally don’t want a potential rival to have control of the materials you need for war production.

          Another legit use is to account for local regulations. If you require local companies to pay in a carbon credit system, an external company could undercut them from abroad. A tariff would help level the playing field.

          None of these apply to what trump is doing. He’s swinging a claymore mine around like a toy hammer. It causes huge damage to all involved.

        • Honeybee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Not an economic, but everything is entangled

          Say you have two products: one from USA ($110) and the same from Canada ($100). Now we impose a tariff of 25 pct on the Canadian product ($125).

          This means that consumers are going to buy the cheaper product, resulting in less income for the Canadian manufacturer.

          The USA manufacturer can increase the price to $120, and still be cheaper than their Canadian counterpart. All while prices for customers are increasing

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The USA manufacturer can increase the price to $120, and still be cheaper than their Canadian counterpart.

            Unless there is no USA manufacturer, or there is but they don’t make nearly enough of the product to satisfy demand. More importantly, if the manufacturers we (USA) have buy much of the needed raw materials to make their products from Canada or other places with tariffs imposed, then a USA-made product becomes that much more expensive.

            It’s stupid, and hard on everyone but the blame is entirely on trump. Canada (and hopefully Mexico) imposing retaliatory tariffs is basically the only way to get trump to back down. Like with MAD (mutually assured destruction), the assured part has to be there or it doesn’t work. Even though it causes pain to everyone, retaliation is the most effective way to end this madness sooner–it will hurt the US economy, raise prices, and turn trump’s supporters against him. The more it hurts, the sooner people will be out in the streets.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              turn trump’s supporters against him

              Other than this, I believe you are totally correct. After everything that’s happened in the past 13 years, what makes you think this will change anyone’s mind?

              A scapegoat(s) will be found, and Trump will make himself out to be the victim. As sure as the sun rises in the east, this will happen. I do not believe his cultists can ever be turned.

              • leadore@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                12 hours ago

                You may be right, it’s certainly been that way so far. It’s amazing how they never blame him for anything. But also, so far they’ve never experienced real negative consequences from his actions either, other than maybe a few small things they could easily dismiss as not related to trump (even if obvious to others). So we’ll see what happens when they and their friends and families start feeling some real pain. Obviously some still won’t be hurt much and some will never be able to admit trump screwed them no matter what, but others have already realized it and more of them will ‘find out’ as things keep getting worse for them.

    • yes_this_time@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes, but items are targeted to inflict the least amount of pain. We don’t neeed orange juice or bourbon for example.

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes, tariffs increase prices in almost any case they’re implemented, which is the goal. Trudeau seems to be hoping that by adding these tariffs, it will become even easier to shift consumer behavior to buy non-American made goods, which could possibly either lead Trump to reduce/remove his tariffs, or at least make Americans feel more of the economic impact of those reductions in sales, which could then push more people to go against Trump politically.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Maybe in Canada. In the US, I fully expect corporations to increase domestic prices by 15-20%, and still have the more attractive option for consumers. If and when the tariffs are dropped, it is unlikely that prices will go back down. Trump essentially just created a permanent new regressive tax, affecting the poorest of US citizens the worst.

        Anyone want to place a bet for what he blames it on? I’m hoping he goes for the classic Obama excuse.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 day ago

    We need to really turn the screws into the U.S. Along with applying tariffs, we also need to just outright stop delivery of critical materials they need. Full Stop.

    I’m know this is just a sounding board, but honestly I’d love to see the cutting off of any and all essential raw materials they need. I’m sure they can source it elsewhere, but they most likely can’t get enough of it fast enough.

    Cut off anything they need for energy and more importantly: agriculture.

    People can live without power. Make their stomachs ache.

    Trump is a diseased cunt who doesn’t understand what happens when things don’t go his own way. Let’s show him.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Everytime Trump threatens tariffs they should out a one week export ban on literally everything to the US… That would really shock the system.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Beaverton had as a headline a few weeks back along the lines of “Americans choose the most expensive way to figure out what they purchase from Canada” which I thought was appropriate.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      I said it before. Stop sending aluminum and steel and aerospace and military manufacturing would suffer immensely. That is 90%+ of all good made, metals have strict import requirements and certifications, and we couldn’t just make our own on a whim.

    • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Starting off slow and ramping up sends the correct message that (a) we want to find a way to stop this garbage and (b) we can and will make things more painful for business and consumers alike if it continues long term.

  • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 day ago

    unfortunately, America has created a system where we can’t really do anything about the president at this point I am really wondering how long will the global world order allow Donald Trump to continue to screw things up for everybody else? Not just talking about economics with Mexico, Canada and China. But also the military situation in Ukraine, which directly impacts the European Union as well as NATO 

    • "no" banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem is that the global order is collapsing. That’s what makes this possible for Trump and his companions. It’s been going to shit for a while. We’re entering a world where international law will be less important. Sadly.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        International law was already completely irrelevant when it came to the developed world imposing its will on the entire developing world, or anyone classified as an “enemy”. There are hundreds of violations across the years that were never enforced, from America carpet bombing south east asia and installing puppet regimes around the world, to Russias use of phosphorous warheads and chemical weapons in Syria, to Israel (and allies) genocide in Palestine.

        International laws have only ever been, at best, gentleman’s agreements among the developed world’s oligarchs and political classes.

        What’s happening now is the US political class and oligarchy are shifting allegiance to fascist authoritarianism and imperialism, because both are populated with mentally ill narcissists and psychopaths of insatiable greed and megalomania, completely detached from reality; no different to the feudalist monarchs, emperors and pharaohs of old.

        I also don’t believe this is an America problem, as much as it is a capitalism problem. Americas oligarchy are no different to Russias oligarchy, who are no different to Chinas oligarchy, who are no different to every oligarchy. They are borderless, stateless, only worship wealth and power, and are a reflection of the psychology created by unchecked wealth and power; these people view themselves as the rightful rulers of humanity, by virtue of their wealth and power, and views concepts like democracy a direct threat to their existence.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Fucking phenomenal run for American upper-middle classers & up for daysssss (decades)

          Staycations on every screen, DoorDash, weekends at national parks, summers full of music festivals, no air raid sirens or drafts

          Little blips of economic busts and terrorism, but overall stable with a solid stock market. The climate taking its beating without much protest. The developing world manufacturing much of our own world for pennies on the dollar, their conditions out of sight and out of mind. Stagnant minimum wage, the prison industrial complex, the crimes of the healthcare industry - captivating John Oliver segments, yes, but not pressing personal problems.

          waow that was a lotta work over the years from a lotta good people to get the US here, and now…

          (job hunt question)

          Any recommendations for organizations that might be hiring right now and looking for people who want to fix this?

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        We’re entering a world where international law will be less important. Sadly.

        At the risk of sounding like a broken record: International law was never important. It was always rules for thee and not for me.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      I didn’t want Trump to become president for many reasons, one of the main ones being I didn’t want him to pull USA out of NATO, because it strengthens our shared enemies.

      Things are actually going worse than I expected, which is really impressive.

      • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know people are probably sick of hearing this, but I kind of figured this would be the worst possible case imaginable because the same thing happened to Hitler. They threw his ass in jail and then after a couple of months they let him walk and then when he regained power, he knew that he could never lose power again, and if he did, he’d never be able to accomplish his personal objectives. 

        There’s something about history that we can learn from here. I don’t know why Trump was even allowed to run, but yeah, here we are. 

        • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          He was allowed to run because McConnell stonewalled Obama and let Trump select a bunch of Supreme Court appointees, which then decided that trump can’t be held accountable for anything.

          Then everyone decided the rule of law was important, except trump, which means he’s steamrolling every safeguard we had.

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Plus McConnell as leader could have gotten R’s to convict, at least in the second impeachment after Jan 6th, which was a short window when they would probably have gone along with him. It would have made trump ineligible to run again. So I place a large part of the blame on McConnell.

            The SCOTUS ruling is just icing on the cake for trump, because once he got into power again, SCOTUS isn’t going to be much of a problem for him no matter how much they might rule against him. He’ll just ignore it and no one will do anything about it because the entire repub party supports him–they are the ones who would have had to check his power but they’re completely on board with him and they have the trifecta, total control.

            That’s why I’m worried about the midterms–they aren’t going to give up that power willingly which means they’re more than prepared to do whatever it takes to stop a free and fair election in 2026.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              McConnell basically stated that Trump deserved conviction, but didn’t want congress to be the ones to do it. He wagered that it’s a problem that would take care of itself without having to be the ones to piss off the MAGA people he hoped to keep energized and aligned to the GOP even as Trump went away.

              Then the SC basically said it’s the job of congress, and not the courts (although they reserved the power to specifically declare something as not a duty of the president, so the courts could proceed if and only if the supreme court signs off on it).

              To the extent that it could have maybe had the SC ultimately rule that January 6th was not an official duty, DOJ slow walked the process so that it was way too late before the SC would have even had the chance.

              • leadore@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 minutes ago

                Merrick Garland was Biden’s biggest mistake. By far. But it’s still ultimately McConnell and the other repub senators’ fault. They had the power and more importantly the constitutional responsibility to stop him. They violated their oaths and failed in their duty. It was their cowardice and corruption that allowed this.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 day ago

      I am really wondering how long will the global world order allow Donald Trump to continue to screw things up for everybody else?

      I mean what are they gonna do? Invade and depose him? We’re witnessing the end of the Pax* Americana, simple as that.

      *Terms and conditions apply.

      • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well if this were the middle east or a communist problem , western countries would just have him assassinated…which is horrible- but its true if you go back long enough

        • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 day ago

          The trouble is that the problem is not confined to just Trump. If he dies, Vance becomes president. If they both die, Mike Johnson does. This is not a coup by a single person, this is an entire philosophy - neo-fascism - thats now in charge of the US. Its goose-stepping turtles all the way down.

          • moody@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 day ago

            While that’s all true, nobody likes Vance or Johnson the way they like Trump. If he dies and Vance replaces him, I expect a lot more pushback than what Trump gets.

            • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think any of them give two shits about pushback. Unless that pushback takes the form of forcible removal from power, they wont care in any way.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think it’s within other countries capabilities (Israel maybe, but why would they), nor in their intrest.

          In some failed states it’s considerably easier to have certain people eliminated (and for sure has happened many many times).

          Current USA is an internal affair with external effects. Other countries can’t do anything, that’s what happens when 1 country has the very biggest strongest military and security machine ever (way bigger than any competitor, no country get near). Even if they’ld want to, there is no way. And the current situation is unpredicatble and not stable, it would become even less predictable and less stable when certain people were to be assassinated.

          If assassinations happen in the trump admin in the near future, I think it would more likely come from USA security services internally. Not sure if it’s for the better. Decent chance in that case of civil war type scenarios tbh.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They absolutely can do something. They don’t want to. They support this.

      This is not Donald Trump, this is America. They voted for exactly this. And they seem to be enjoying it.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        I am NOT enjoying it and I’m doing everything in my power to resist this administration.

        Checks instance name

        In Minecraft. Always in Minecraft.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fair, not everyone, but a slight majority of people still support this shitshow.

          • Soulg@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            The polls I saw said the opposite.

            And that’s ignoring that a large percentage of those who do still support our are choosing to believe their messiah over reality and think that it will make everything cheaper; I do believe that as soon as it’s no longer deniable a large chunk will turn on him. But unfortunately not all of them since plenty will be fully prepared to just blame someone else anyway

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              58 minutes ago

              I hope you’re right, but I don’t think it’s hyperbole to call them a cult anymore, if it ever was. I think they will literally reject all evidence and blame whatever scapegoats are decided on by the administration.

              • Soulg@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                A chunk of them definitely will. We just need enough to make it an issue, which probably isn’t all that many.

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Trust me, we (the sane of us) don’t like any part of the dumbest idiots of the country letting it the rich narcissist Nazis takeover them.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The US is one of the only, if not the only country in the world where what can be done is enshrined in the constitution.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lee Harvey Oswald found a way to do something about the presidency. Just saying…

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was going to buy an item but the price went up since yesterday. Not going to buy it now. It’s his tax on us. Not going to finance Krasnov’s destruction of America.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      4 years? Do people really think that there will be mid-term election? and presidential one in 4 years? really?

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        I thought the point of all this was to ratchet up tensions so Trump could declare martial law and suspend democracy indefinitely.

        “We have always been at war with everyone but Russia and China….”

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, elections are run by the states, not the federal government. Will red states have fair elections? Absolutely not.