I will say what being born and raised in Rome taught me: all religious people are dangerous and all priests, for which I have a very wide definition that includes namaste-firing yoga teachers and Elon Musk, are the worst individuals humanity could produce.

Religious people, including the ones that call themselves “atheists but spiritual”, may not be dangerous to you now, but they are then to be regarded as sleeping terrorist cells.

Very good media works depicting the concept are the movie The Mist and the series Midnight Mass.

Priests, in my personal definition, is any person appealing to irrational concepts to predate on people’s ignorance.

I can tell you that I was forbidden from doing that while playing during a vacation in Colorado, mere months before Columbine. This bullshit is ridiculous.

I would like to know what Modi said exactly to elicit such response. I know the guy is not of my liking already, but lately I am interested in knowing whether he is just playing as a relay for Putin or rather distancing himself from him.

It is not the point of this discussion in particular because I am talking about positions held on the basis of reasoning. The wet dreams of an American conservative are not exactly a bright example of logic.

That is not the same as making them cease to exist. A lot of people wish that was the case, but hundreds of martyrs, saints and not, prove them wrong.

Are you lost? Come with me, I will help you find your mommy.

Everyone answering me seems to not allow for the option that I may not counter the other person with an alternative I defend with reason. My dislike for that expression assumes that I find myself in a discussion over something worth defending with reason, otherwise there is no discussion in the first place.

Of all things, cooking a steak is the worst example maybe. Also, there is no reasoning around not allowing things or people to exist because, for one, they exist.

Except for it being called Blade Runner and not striking any resemblance to the original.

If it came out as it’s own thing I would have called it a good movie, although a bit bland and with poorly written characters, but as a sequel to Blade Runner, no way.

I will go against most opinions and I would say give it a try.

My friends who are into the book quoted much more from the second and style-wise I can tell you this: I LOVED the first one. I HATED the second one.

So, since the book seems really to be about deception, war and religion (the last 2 I despise to see in movies because I find them boring as hell), I could suggest you watch it.

“Let’s agree to disagree”.

No, you asshole, we are getting to the bottom of this: you expose your reasoning for your position and I will do the same and this ends when reason doesn’t support anymore one of the 2 sides.

And The Hobbit (respect to Del Toro for giving up before it was too late). And Justice League (even if, after Dawn of the Dead and 300, Snyder never did a good one again).

BR2049 is shit. A mix of uninspired stuff, nice concept art and fan service, with a bad CGI Rachel.

I love Villeneuve’s work elsewhere, but there he really fucked up.

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem.

Warmly recommended to kids and adults alike. Fantastic style, cool action sequences, top-notch voice acting and cool story. It may seem derivative of Spiderman Into the Spider verse, but it’s better in many respects.

You mean Putin, the Poisoner of Underwear?

Good like having Disney depicting that.

Man! The moustache is the only thing I don’t want to shave! It’s Movember.

I don’t wish any such thing to the Russian people as a whole, against whom I have absolutely nothing. The thought of it as a possibility deeply saddens me.

That’s how we lost the possibility of a Metro 2033 film

Doesn’t it get just damp and smooth? How can you scrub properly with that?

Anyway good to know what they are for when there is no bidet in sight.