• bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    How is it suited to AI?

    Would you rather pay for a limited, energy inefficient and less accessible thing or a real human that can adapt and gain skills, be mentored?

    I don’t know why there’s a question here

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      (Glad we’re treating each other with mutual respect)

      Would you rather pay for a limited in depth, energy inefficient (food/shelter/fossil-fuel consuming) and less accessible (needs to sleep, has an outside life) human, or an AI that can adapt and gain skills with a few thousand training cycles.

      I dont buy the energy argument. I dont buy the skills argument. I do buy the argument that humans shouldn’t be second to automatons and deserve to be nurtured, but only on ethical grounds.

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If we have a people communication method, let them talk to people. If it’s a computer interface, apeing humans is a waste and less accessible than a web form.

        How is someone that speaks a different language supposed to translate that voice bot? Wouldn’t it be more simple to translate text on a screen?

        What’s the value add pretending?

        The AI can’t adapt in the moment. A hotel is not a technology company that can train a model. It won’t be bespoke, so it won’t be following current, local laws.