• Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    This was a decent explainer. In a nutshell…

    • There are four categories of trade barriers in Canada: natural barriers such as geography, prohibitive barriers such as restrictions on the sale of alcohol, technical barriers such as vehicle weight standards and regulatory barriers such as licensing and paperwork requirements.

    • The 2017 CFTA was intended to cut down on some of these barriers, but all provinces and territories negotiated exemptions for various reasons, ranging from different safety regulations across provinces, to different language requirements, to industry protectionism.

    It’s not clear right now which barriers the feds can unilaterally eliminate (and whether we agree with all of them), but I guess we’ll find out within the next week or so.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks!

      So basically a question of natural barriers and I guess you could call it “standardization”; different provinces having different rules.

      • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Pretty much. There’s a strong argument that “eliminating barriers” may be synonymous with “deregulation,” which…could go badly.

        • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yup. An example would be tractor trailer loads, ie: in Saskatchewan a tractor can legally pull 3 trailers … in BC that’s impossible because of the Rockies. There’s also the issue of tire chains: in BC it’s manditory for some highways (incl tractors) and on others it’s not. Chains in the prairies just don’t make sense, and they chew up the asphalt something fierce.

          It’ll take a while to sort out what’s OK and what’s not.

          • Dearche@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Even for that example, there’s the issue of maximum height as well. Different provinces have different standards for clearance, which is why every once in a while you hear about a truck that strikes a bridge or other underpass.