• UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Non edit this time,

    Why wouldn’t I want to give other access to body modifications even if i myself had those problems. Cause what I really needed was better adults to talk to and more people to tell me everything is fine.

    And I know I don’t have nearly as many problems as teans kids. And it’s in abd faith to compare myself. I was originally trying to point out that I don’t agree with giving kids drugs to change thrier lives cause then at what point does it get out of control and it’s just blown over.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So like, dress and act how you want, but actual genderaffirming care should be left till at least on can have a drink over it first.

      Your comment still stands like that.

      We’re not talking about “body modifications”. We are talking about gender affirming care. You may pretend it’s “body modification” but like most people have said, all of your rhetoric relies on an asinine view of a kid being able to just go up to their liberal parents and say “I want a complete gender reassignment” and get it, when any trans person goes through tons of psychiatrists and evaluations. They’re not given anything that we haven’t found to be medically safe. Which is why your “body modifications” of some absurd dick size and bone lengthening at an age where you’re still growing wouldn’t be accepted by any medical professionals as “gender affirming care.”

      It’s a childish strawman which you use to justify an extremely shitty slippery slope argument. Puberty blockers are safe and effective.

      Based on your answers, I assume you must be fervently against circumcision, because that is a literal permanent physical change to one’s genitals, and the kid doesn’t even have a say in it, much less making the choice for themselves when “they’re old enough to have a drink over it.” So you oppose allowing circumcision unless it’s medically necessary. You also oppose teenage males who get bullied for having tits getting care for that extremely simple problem. That’s the only logical conclusion from your rhetoric.

      • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

        Which since talking to other people I leavened of CPP but that’s literally health problems so it’s deffrnrt.

        But, your making up stuff and trying to mold the arguem t so your right.

        Ans lastly cause you wanna add it in, yeah I am against circumcision. But keep changing the argument

        • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

          RIP little Timmy, he could have lived with chemo but UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works doesn’t want children to take drugs.

          • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So I don’t ad life altering drugs one time and you pounce on it? There’s obviously a diffrnence between life altering and life saving drugs. Way to take one except out of context.

            Gross

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

          So no healthcare for children, got it. No operations for fat boys with moobs, no circumcisions and since you phrase it that way, guess no medication for any other illnesses either, huh? And the reason for this asinine take is the view that you think that children can simply go to a doctors and command them to give them full gender reassignments.

          Your ignorance has been the issue the whole time. You’re afraid of a problem which doesn’t exist and because of that you want to make life miserable for those you pretend you’re looking out for. It’s horrific, tbh.

          “Making up stuff.” Name one.

          And now you’re spamming typos on purpose to even further pretend like you never edited anything to add anything to your comment, despite there being “edit” and “edit edit” and several sentences with those. Who do you think you’re lying to?

          • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Making stuff up?

            you added 17 edits and made your arguemt 600% longer <–Lie your argument changed completely <-- Lie

            And I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There’s no winnignwith you

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

              I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

              You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.

              You added several sentences. You didn’t just “fix typos”.

              I also fixed typos after proofreading. Takes a whole of twenty seconds as you can see.

              • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 hours ago

                No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.

                Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen.

                  #No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

                  Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.

                  I added all my thoughts immediately.

                  Not before I had already replied to you.

                  • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Idk what to tell you. Maybe you already had the threads loaded. Maybe my client needed an extra minute to update right there. I went back to my comment immediately after to add the edit and edit edit.

                    Do you want me to be more sketch next time and not even try to add that I edited my comment. Or maybe next tiem I’ll add timestamps of when I edit every single word or sentence. But you’re taking this way too far.

                    My original common, which minimally changed to clarify my messups, didn’t have anything to do with surgery’s, talked about my wanting a bigger dick, and stated people should be able tonexpress how they feel just no life altering drugs.

                    Even what I added after doesn’t change what inworte. Even though I added them immediately