Summary

Elon Musk and his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) have been granted access to the U.S. Treasury’s federal payment system, raising concerns about security and misuse.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent approved the move after a top Treasury official was ousted for resisting.

Critics warn Musk could freeze payments to government programs or manipulate federal contracts.

The move coincides with DOGE’s takeover of the Office of Personnel Management.

Experts call it a dangerous power grab, as Musk holds no official government position.

  • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Thanks to Verizon/TMobile/AT&T being the swiss cheese fort Knox, I’d be surprised if Felon Skum didn’t have it.

    Companies have played fast and loose with our PII for so long that it’s at a point where we need something else to act as that value so it’s actually secret. But with this administration, that would end up being a wrist tattoo…

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I already have a suspicion that he might already be leaking information out to third parties from Twitter (private messages, etc.), so…

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Everyone has my social security number. It’s one of the stupidest security fails of all time that nobody seems to want to fix. And now there is an entire “credit protection” industry so it will remain that way.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    All of my data got breached multiple times going back to the dot-com bubble days, by Yahoo, the original 2015 OPM Beach and by two of the big credit bureaus for a start. If Musk has my social at this point it doesn’t matter.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    SSN is not a password and anyone who uses it like one doesn’t understand security because you can’t change it. It’s a user ID, like a finger print or email address.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      It’s weird that SSNs are treated as some sort of secret number given they don’t have any security features. They were never supposed to be used the way they’re used today, but there’s no good alternative yet.

      The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI (public key infrastructure) where you can generate new ID numbers based on a private key. Each bank, lender, employer, etc that needs it would get a unique ID that only works for them, and you could revoke access for just that one company if needed.

      Kinda like how OAuth/OIDC login works, where you can log in to sites using your Google account, Apple account, self-hosted Authentik or Authelia, etc. but the site you’re logging in to never sees your password. If a site/app misbehaves, you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working.

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Here’s your ID. You can decide who gets to have it.

          Easy. The average person isn’t going to care about the nerdy shit behind it, any more than they care how Facebook works behind the scenes.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 hours ago

            They’ve been pushing against a national ID for decades so good luck convincing grandma it’s not the mark of the beast or something.

      • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI… you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working

        There is already an open standard growing around exactly this concept, Web5 Distributed IDs (DID): https://dev.to/tbdevs/what-is-web5-233o

        Disclosure: I worked on the implementation for an Open Banking company (does that need to be disclosed? <shrug> I’m including it lest someone think I’m a shill)

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Just to culture shock Americans: it’s not exactly the same but in Sweden our personal numbers are kept in the open. Even online. Searchable databases with names, phone numbers, addresses etc. It tells you if someone has a dog. It tells you if they have a car. Which car, even. Some tell you the income of the person you’re searching for. Sites even exist that could tell you if I’ve commited a crime. Some people think that’s unreasonable. Irresponsible even!

    That said, as pertains to the article, the fact that he has that info seems pretty unreasonable and irresponsible.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      My USA town will let you look up your taxes with just your last name and first initial. You can find out what real estate and car someone owns with that. Dog license seems to be in a different system.

      My salary is public information because I’m a public employee.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      At least in the past, you could use a person’s ssn to open credit cards, change utilities, and generally ruin someone’s life. Someone took out a credit card with my SSN when I was like 9 or 10 and it caused issues when I became an adult and tried to get a student loan for uni.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        That is technically possible with our information too. It happens, but is bothersome. Taking out massive loans is possible too, with the right bank on the right day.

        You’d need some way to verify the identity, but since such signatures are handled digitally through an app it’s just a good phishing call away really. You already have the phone number and the address if you have the personal identification number.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          In the US, if you know someone’s address (which is trivially easy to find online) and their social security number, you can open credit cards online.
          The number itself is considered secure, so knowledge of the number is assumed to be enough identity confirmation for most applications.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That is technically possible with our information too. It happens, but is bothersome.

          Ohh well in that case, I’m sure nobody would bother taking advantage of it for free money…

          • no banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Oh, it totally happens. It’s not that I wanted to say that it’s too bothersome. Scammers will do what scammers do.

            There’s actually been some talk about gangs running such business from Spain. Mostly scamming old people.

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s not that we don’t have all that info and more available, it’s that we want you to pay a data broker for it.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Some of this data, like commited crimes, is usually behind such a barrier here too. Though it is possible, even if a bit more complex, to get that info by yourself directly from the courts.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Didn’t Elon get hacked and his SS number leaked?

    No, I’m not about to go search for that, but I’m pretty sure that happened, with the 23andme data breach…

  • ohellidk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’m sure quite a few people have mine. SSN’s aren’t a secure thing at all. It should be updated.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You can get anyone’s SSN for $15 on the dark web. lol. The amount of leaks/hacks that have happened to all of the companies that require your SSN is insane.

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You can get it on the clear web for about $20 completely legitimately. Background checks have been a thing forever and reveal basically everything.

        • nomy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You’d hope so but not really, they basically need as much partial information as you can supply so they know they’re finding the right records.

          Fullz are great because you already know that social belongs to that person but you really just need enough cross-verifiable information to confirm. If you only have one or two pieces of info you can pay somebody like Checkr or Certn to run your check or just find a local PI to pull them. If you have LE connects they have access to databases with criminal histories as well but AFAIK (in my state at least) those searches are logged.