I’m torn on the concept of E-cores for servers. I understand the desire to be more green and power efficient, but given the parallel nature and large processing that occurs on servers would that be an efficient use with a partial configuration of slower threads.
Regardless, people use what they’re given so I’m sure they’ll work it out.
I daily an E-xeon for work. At home, I use an 8750h i7 laptop.
When I open 3 Firefox windows, powershell, AD, 4 remote desktop Windows, and play YouTube my E-xeon shits it’s pants, smears it all over itself and lets me watch as it spikes to 100% utilization.
My 8750h laptop plays helldivers2, YouTube(10 extra tabs as well), and compiles package manager updates. And helldivers never even skips a beat.
My laptop is a 180watt laptop. My work machine uses easily 300watts.
She also revealed that Panther Lake would be followed by a next-gen product called Nova Lake, which would utilize a mix of internal and external fab processes, meaning a reliance on non-Intel factories.
They are already expecting Nova Lake to be reliant on external fabs? How do they expect to service external customers when they themselves don’t want to be committed to their fab business?
No GPUs is not good, for me as a gamer. I hope they bring the B770 cards to the market at least.
The headline could be a bit more clear. They are referring to the “Falcon Shores” enterprise GPU.
To my knowledge, they are still committed to the B7XX series and even the next generation dGPU (celestial).
Ah, thanks for clearing that up for me.
