• GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Time to go see if China are interested in building some military bases on Greenland. Same thing for Panama for that matter. Maybe Canada wants some help as well?

    • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      And the heads who would replace him.

      That’s the important thing, because Trump at least is dumb as a bucket of shit, imagine someone with the same ideology, but more than one brain cell taking his place.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    15 hours ago

    And you know he’s escalating because his narcissistic personality hates being told no, especially on such a public stage.

  • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Why do we want Greenland anyway? It’s the icy one, right?

    No but serious question. What value does it have?

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Well that’s nice and all, but IMO the real reason is Trump got laughed at last term when he suggested buying Greenland, and now he has to buy it to show how good of an idea it was and that he totally wasn’t upset by the mocking. Like when you tell a toddler not to do something and they immediately start doing it more.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Resources, north sea access, missile defense.

        It’s dumb but with climate change it’s valuable territory, geopolitically.

        The stupidity is we already have all the military stuff we need there, and long standing agreements.

        It’s also Denmark’s so we should fuck off.

        In addition to it not being for sale, Annexation is bullshit because it doesn’t provide proper representation to those that live there. The whole country was formed with ideas of representation and taxation in mind (albeit quite imperfectly). Anywhere the US flag flies, those under it should get full rights and powers as a citizen.

        • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s also only 50k population, so it won’t affect the voting distribution. Adding socialist Canada would likely sway the distribution as Canadian conservatives trend more Like US democrats.

        • Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Anywhere the US flag flies, those under it should get full rights and powers as a citizen.

          Including the moon. Especially the moon.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    20 hours ago

    …Trump took the unprecedented step of refusing to rule out military action to take territory from a Nato ally…

    what. the. fuck.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What even happens if one NATO member attacks another? Does the aggressor immediately get their membership nullified and the rest must come together and declare war on them?

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mean, it’s never happened. But the US declaring war on Danish territory would violate Article 5.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      i’m guessing that heputin thinks that doing so would be enough to break apart the alliance or get the u.s. kicked out.

  • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    The US congress must approve a declaration of war. Here is to hoping that there are enough sane senators left. Nobody wants this war, but if Europe doesn’t stand up to bullies, we’re doomed to be taken advantage of further. This is a challenge that will define a generation of European leadership.

    I also find it delightfully ironic that the US now risks invading Denmark and it’s up to the rest of EU to stand up against it when Denmark spied for the US on the rest of the EU between 2012 and 2014 and were caught red handed.

    Just goes to show the old lesson of what the US does to its allies once they’re no longer useful.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I don’t think it’ll start with a formal declaration. He won’t get that.

      I think he’ll order the military to stop paying for the US military base in Greenland without leaving, then have them expand operations outside of the agreement to provoke a response.

      This will of course make every other country far less likely to renew or grant leases for US military bases and reduce US global military hegemony. But nobody driving this is thinking that far ahead.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        every other country far less likely to renew or grant leases for US military bases are reduce global military hegemony. But nobody driving this is thinking that far ahead.

        Oh I suspect some of the people driving this are getting exactly what they paid for.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We haven’t declared war since WW2. The President can launch an attack without needing Congress backing for ~90 days if I remember correctly. I’m hoping he isn’t dumb enough to do so, but he may get drunk one night and set it off while bitching on truth social at 1 in the morning and make a drunken phone call because he’s not mentally stable.

      • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        In a world where he is bound by laws he is also bound to uphold treaties ratified by Congress, and attacking Greenland is an immediate violation of our NATO treaties. So if Congress actually felt like flexing its authority they could shut down an invasion immediately, but I have little hope of that happening.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Only if the Senate would prosecute him does Congress have any real say. Would it be an offense that should have him impeached and removed immediately, yes. Would they do so… Doubt it.

          The question is, “is there at least 33 scumbags and a JD Shit for Brians in the Senate?” The answer is easy. Absolutely. He likely could level their 3 largest cities with carpet bombs killing 25,000+ people and threaten to attack any country who moves to retaliate or protect them. Unless all of NATO/EU mobilized together, they would just give it up. Hell, that’s 20,000 people less than Israel has killed, and the world just watched. Suppressing 25,000 people scattered throughout the land are easy to suppress compared to the almost 50 million that were in countries like Iraq. He could end the war before Congress could potentially convene, and pass the impeachment documents to the Senate for a trial.

          NATO wouldn’t want to fight the U.S. when Russia is already engaging from the East and trying to grab more land

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, but we’re talking about a potential Greenland War here, it’s not gonna be just a little Vietnam tour, or like the Korea Kerfuffle. The exercises in Iraq and Afghanistan also don’t really compare.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I hope NATO responds… but is this partially an effort to weaken and distract NATO so it’s easier for Putin to have his way with Europe?

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I wonder what the real problem play is here.

    • Distraction to soak up outrage and attention?
    • Actual desire to take Greenland because they global warming will unveil riches beneath the ice?
    • Naively thinking NATO will abandon the USA as quickly as Trump would abandon NATO?
    • Thinking they can divert NATO defenses to Greenland instead of Ukraine?

    No scenario seems like a smart play but that’s MAGA for you.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      19 hours ago
      • Dementia-addled brain latches onto a stupid obsession for random reasons and everyone ends up trying to figure out what 4-D chess move is really behind it.

      It’s still a problem the world needs to deal with, but I don’t think it’s as deep as everyone thinks.

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I agree. He just wants to have it because he floated the idea once and people disagreed with him. The dangerous part is when it eventually becomes an embarrassment to him because Denmark and the EU won’t budge.

    • Irelephant@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think that invading greenland is an effective way to destroy nato. Russia and China would be pleased.

    • 50MYT@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Its a smart play for china.

      China will be happy to pump this with trump.

      Trump will happily be told by china he can have it if they can have Taiwan. He won’t care about the second part, just hearing he is ok to proceed will send him signing orders

      Then Europe/NATO will object complain, block fight etc.

      Suddenly dollar isn’t the Petro dollar anymore because of their stability issues. China will step up and trumpet themselves as the stable one so use them.

      Once Petro dollar isn’t USA anymore all hell breaks lose economy wise.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Other post on topic had comment on new shipping lanes near Arctic thawing and already being used by Chinese ships illegally and the rich fucks want control.

    • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      1 seems the most likely to me. 2 won’t be relevant for at least another 60 years or so, 3 I hope is not true, 4 seems absurd to me.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Why does everyone keep taking Trump at face value? His security concerns are a cover for the resources American companies want to extract from Greenland.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because Greenland is open for business without the threats. Arguably, it’s less open for business now.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This isn’t post world war 2 global trade, this is 19th century global trade. They want full control.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Then they can get fucked, the EU will defend Greenland’s (prospective) sovereignty.

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Moreover, it is possible that this is one of his hander’s favourite strategies. He’s making a lot of smoke about the whole Greenland thing, so he is trying to bury something bad in the news. Potentially how staple item prices are going to skyrocket in the US when your oil, lumber and more than half of your raw minerals cost 25% more.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Don’t need to steal it if it’s offered to you… I don’t understand… That’s going to be my motto for the next 4 years. I expect it’ll only get worse

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Unless the offer is everything is free and the US gets to control its territorial waters then it’s not a good enough deal to them. Again, why buy when you can steal.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    19 hours ago

    He has his loyalists in power. No one to say no to him and that will follow his orders.

    He cycled through a lot of staff last time round

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Not saying he won’t fire a bunch of people this time, but last time he was in so far over his head he didn’t know he had to hire/bring in all of those positions. He thought he just walked in and the people were there to bark orders at.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Indeed. He probably presumed he was emperor supreme last time and got a rude awakening. So he’s (well his handlers) spent the last 4 years making it so next time round he would actually be emperor.

  • Cargon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Can someone please just nuke us already? We are unworthy of continued existence.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The handlers will just let Donny play in a protected playpen and scream and shout all he wants and they’ll throw in a stuffed toy or a plastic toy he can easily break and get his frustrations out.

      The problems will start when little Donny will start to get out of control and start pushing buttons he isn’t supposed to have access to.

      Hopefully, the Nuclear Football is baby proofed enough to keep us all alive.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    taking greenland will just a easy simple step in making a list of names of all the people who would stand up/protest, before he starts all the actual wars in the middle east