If all it took was people on social grumbling about their terrible policy plank to sink the campaign, maybe, just maybe, they ran a shit campaign and thereās lessons to be learned.
If all it took was people on social grumbling about their terrible policy plank to sink the campaign, maybe, just maybe, they ran a shit campaign and thereās lessons to be learned.
āThe Dems ran a shit campaignā and āMaybe running negative PR campaigns against a candidate reduces a candidateās supportā are not mutually exclusive options.
Tl;Dr the election was the only place that we had to have that discussion.
Look, there was a primary in the literal sense, I voted in it, but there wasnāt a primary in the practical sense. There were no debates, no discussion of his platform for '24, Biden didnāt campaign, and the Democratic party / Biden Campaign worked HARD to shut down questions about Bidenās viability or the Mandela effect where everyone seemed to remember him promising to be a single term president. I mean, I could swear I remember it too; Iām still puzzled about where so many folks got the idea. Then, once we were way past the primary, we found out that Biden was nowhere even near viable shape for the campaign trail. He put on the most disastrously bad debate performance in presidential debate history against an opponent that should have been (and was just four years prior) a joke. None of his other āsee? Heās fineā appearances before or after inspired much faith either. So, we basically ended up with Harris and zero discussion about her platform. At first, I was really excited and eager to see what her platform would be. As time went on, though, I started seeing more and more that reminded me of HRC '16 and less meat to get excited about. If there had been a real primary in a practical sense, I would not have voted for Harris (and didnāt vote for Biden, I think I voted Phillips) on the platform she had.
The primaries are a time for the campaigns to work with voters and figure this stuff out, see what appeals to the base and is likely to get them to turn out. We never got to have that conversation with Harris, we barely had it at all with Biden. The only place we could have it is during the election, and my hope was (and remains) that campaigns are agile enough to respond when their base gives them feedback. I donāt support the Democrats because theyāre Democrats, I support them because they offer the closest practical path to policies I want to see enacted. I want to see good policy win, and I think good policy will get the democrats their wins. We canāt ever improve if we canāt be accept criticism, and when it comes to politics, the appropriate way to criticize is a bit like finding the appropriate way to protest according to Fox News. We need to have these conversations to get better, and I absolutely do blame the Harris and Biden campaigns for putting themselves in such vulnerable positions and failing to respond appropriately to criticism. Their job is to get elected, and they failed.
Shitty as it was, there was no third or fourth option to be had; once Harris was in the driverās seat, it was going to be her or Trump, simply by the way our political system is set up. With that in mind, going forward, all questions would have to boil down to āIs it preferable for Harris to enter into the presidency, or Trump?ā
If itās election-time in 1930 Weimar Germany, and my only viable choices in the election district Iām in are the SDP and the Nazis, banging the drum 24/7 on how the SDP is anti-LGBT (true) might not be the greatest choice in the coming election considering that the only other choice are the Nazis, who are MORE anti-LGBT plus a whole host of other horrific things. And if the Nazis themselves are beating that same drum, telling LGBT folk that the SDP is anti-LGBT, I might step back and consider whose electoral victory Iām contributing to by my rhetoric and what consequences it will have - such as on, say, LGBT folk.
Weāre sitting here with literal fascists in government. āOur aristocrats werenāt good enough, or didnāt take the correct stance on foreign policy!ā isnāt the correct answer to why this election turned out the way it did. Or if it is, that reflects such a broken attitude on the part of the American electorate that itās not much better than the actual conclusion - most Americans do not care if fascism comes into power. And that includes everyone who didnāt vote, or protest voted. And many of those who didnāt vote or protest voted were inspired to do so by rhetoric encouraging apathy from both conservatives and their useful idiots.
Should the Dems have done a whole host of things differently, including having actual primaries? Are the Dems spineless corporate weasels? Are the Dems beholden to Israeli interests even in the face of a divided base? Yes, yes, yes. But none of that justifies āWeāre going to let or help the literal fascists win.ā
Look, my dude. The democrats were basically just trailing the republicans by maybe 12 years. At best, this victory would have bought us just a few more years of uneasy status quo and failing to address the causes and conditions that brought us to this point. As things were, we were getting our Nazi arc sooner or later. Iād rather choose no Nazis at all, and have the uncomfortable conversations needed to make that happen. Until we address the conditions that brought us to this point, we would, at any rate, inevitably tip into open fascism; shutting up, falling in line, and hoping that theyāll win if we donāt think bad thoughts about the democrats wonāt fix it. Letās face it, there wasnāt a political appetite for fixing it in the next four years, as there wasnāt in the last four years (see: Merrick Garland). We needed to fix it, and we still do.
Just so Iām clear, Iāve read chunks of Project 2025. My kids are on the chopping block. I am begging the democrats to do better than being diet Nazi.
Look, my dude. The democrats were basically just trailing the republicans by maybe 12 years.
Are you fucking kidding me?
Holy fucking shit.
Do you not remember the Republicans OR the Democrats 12 fucking years ago?
At best, this victory would have bought us just a few more years of uneasy status quo and failing to address the causes and conditions that brought us to this point. As things were, we were getting our Nazi arc sooner or later.
Oh, great, the āLetās just get it over withā argument.
Until we address the conditions that brought us to this point, we would, at any rate, inevitably tip into open fascism; shutting up, falling in line, and hoping that theyāll win if we donāt think bad thoughts about the democrats wonāt fix it. Letās face it, there wasnāt a political appetite for fixing it in the next four years, as there wasnāt in the last four years (see: Merrick Garland). We needed to fix it, and we still do.
Oh, okay, so are we in a better position to address those conditions now that Trump was elected, or worse?
Worse?
In every sense?
Huh.
That youāre sitting here saying the Dems were just following the GOP and that the Dems are āDiet Naziā, more now than they were previously, is exactly the kind of fact-free vibes-based fucking politics that I expect from my fellow Americans, and that fascists leverage so easily into voter apathy. I suppose it was stupid of me to expect people who took enough of an interest in politics to discuss it to have higher standards.
Not necessarily letās get it over with as much as āletās stop ratcheting right in order to win some elections and make stuff betterā. Since 2016, there has NEVER been a good time to vote third party or criticize the democrats. Basically, since Trump got on scene, the democrats became so completely fragile that you canāt say bad stuff about them or disagree with them or theyāll lose :(
But letās get real. The Harris campaign didnāt have a lot of meat to offer people, their entire strategy was ānot Trumpā. Thatās not great, but then itās also ānot Trumpā while telling everyone that the economy is fine actually, that theyāre going to keep giving Israel billions in bombs but donāt worry because theyāre totally going to do the ceasefire this time, that theyāre going to crack down on the border even harder, and that theyāre going to support expanding fracking. They werenāt saying āweāre the opposite of Trumpā when they said ānot Trumpā. This might as well have been a Republican primary with John Kasich vs Trump.
Well, anyway, I guess a few of us shattered the Harris campaign into a trillion tiny pieces when we tried to push for good policies that might have actually won them the election. Snark aside, I am legitimately disappointed that this is where things are at; we should have been able to fix it, but we didnāt have the political will, and now weāve already got democrats signalling the eagerness to work with the Trump presidency. Weāre here now, can we please talk about how to make stuff better yet?
Not necessarily letās get it over with as much as āletās stop ratcheting right in order to win some elections and make stuff betterā.
Okay. Did the Trump victory make āratcheting rightā less likely?
No?
It made it more likely?
And reduces the chance of winning elections?
And ensures that everything is going to get worse?
There was no fucking reason for anyone who isnāt a fascist to sit this fucking one out.
Since 2016, there has NEVER been a good time to vote third party or criticize the democrats. Basically, since Trump got on scene, the democrats became so completely fragile that you canāt say bad stuff about them or disagree with them or theyāll lose :(
Since Trump got on the scene, weāve had a literal fascist who has the only other party in the country in lockstep behind him; yes, it is kind of important that he be defeated at the ballot box? Jesus fucking Christ.
But letās get real. The Harris campaign didnāt have a lot of meat to offer people, their entire strategy was ānot Trumpā. Thatās not great, but then itās also ānot Trumpā while telling everyone that the economy is fine actually, that theyāre going to keep giving Israel billions in bombs but donāt worry because theyāre totally going to do the ceasefire this time,
Which has been bipartisan for the past forty fucking years. Itās hardly proof that the Dems were āfollowing 12 years behind the GOPā. The Dem platform was the most anti-Israel Iāve seen in my lifetime, and while thatās damnation by faint praise, the message sent by the fucking electorate was: āThe more pro-Israel candidate has wonā
that theyāre going to crack down on the border even harder,
Almost 80% of Americans buy into the idea that thereās a ācrisisā on the border, with broad bipartisan support. Do you really think thatās the issue that discouraged people from voting for Harris?
They werenāt saying āweāre the opposite of Trumpā when they said ānot Trumpā. This might as well have been a Republican primary with John Kasich vs Trump.
Ah, yes, John Kasichās well known clean energy, free college, marijuana decriminalization, corporate tax raising, LGBT supporting, pro-DEI, anti-price gouging, pro-choice, public healthcare expansion platform.
Well, anyway, I guess a few of us shattered the Harris campaign into a trillion tiny pieces when we tried to push for good policies that might have actually won them the election. Snark aside, I am legitimately disappointed that this is where things are at; we should have been able to fix it, but we didnāt have the political will, and now weāve already got democrats signalling the eagerness to work with the Trump presidency.
āPeople in government want to work with those who hold power in governmentā
Who could have predicted this? If only there was something we couldāve done, like put someone else in power in the government.
Weāre here now, can we please talk about how to make stuff better yet?
Sure, we can bring up some form of action, and then everyone who played purity politics can say that our allies arenāt good enough to unite against fascists with, again, and we can repeat the 2024 election for every undertaking we have from here on out, electoral or otherwise.
Youāre right, Pug, a billion dollars in direct spending was derailed by people pointing out the bad things they were seeing. It definitely wasnāt the bad things that cost her the election, just the people acknowledging that the bad things existed and suggesting she do something different. I forgot, if youāre in a car with someone who is about to drive or a cliff, the best thing you can do is remain quiet; you wouldnāt want to distract the driver with your negativity. Once again, Pug, your brilliant insights have saved the day.
I think itās not fucking magic, Pug. There was far more negative campaigning coming from the hundreds of millions spent by the Trump campaign. There was even more money spent by Harris to negatively campaign against Trump, for all the good it did. But leftists complaining online threw the election? Everyone needs to shut up and smile, because if they criticize the Democrats too loudly theyāll collapse? Is that where weāre at?
I think itās not fucking magic, Pug. There was far more negative campaigning coming from the hundreds of millions spent by the Trump campaign.
So?
There are millions of votes other than mine; it doesnāt mean that Iām not responsible for my vote, or my other actions.
But leftists complaining online threw the election?
No. But leftists playing negative PR games online contributed to the loss. Iāve said elsewhere, I donāt think they were the tipping point.
But neither was Iowa, yet everyone who voted for Trump or abstained in Iowa is a fucking contributor to the fascist regime.
Not being the deciding factor does not absolve you of the implications of your choices.
Everyone needs to shut up and smile, because if they criticize the Democrats too loudly theyāll collapse? Is that where weāre at?
We were going into an election everyone knew was going to be close, against a literal fascist.
Maybe a little of the āUnited Frontā spirit wouldāve been welcome, instead of playing the usual games of āUndermine the SHITLIBSā when there was a candidate promising fascism, with the necessary background to confirm his intentions as sincere, as the only other choice in the running. Itās not even a question of āI oppose all aid to Israelā, but āHarris is a genocide supporter!ā The issue was not voicing policy concerns; it was attacking the less vile of the only two candidates who could win.
Tell me, if the election had been lost by a few dozen votes, instead of a touch under two million, would your response be different? Or would it still be āBeating the negative PR drum is Just My Opinionā?
Cant believe after all the messaging around this election that āShut up, give me your vote, and get zero concessionsā is still not attractive to people for some reason. I swear I heard it everywhere, from every blue maga shill and self aggrandizing liberal in the internetā¦ but despite it saturating the narrative she still tanked. Strange how that works.
Cant believe after all the messaging around this election that āShut up, give me your vote, and get zero concessionsā is still not attractive to people for some reason.
Iām sorry that you didnāt get enough āconcessionsā to justify trying for less genocide instead of more genocide. We who are on the list for the death camps thank you for your moral fucking purity.
Once Israel is done murdering all of Palestine with Trumpās full support and the Palestinian genocide is no longer an issue that can be addressed, Iām sure youāll find some other excuse to avoid ever having to ādebaseā yourself by voting against minorities in the US being rounded up and sent to camps. Nothing is ever pure enough, except letting disadvantaged groups be murdered by conservatives, apparently.
Fucking incredible how far youāll go to blame everyone but the people responsible for the loss. Oh, did Harrisā shitty campaign cause widespread voter apathy? Donāt blame the campaign for that, blame the people who talked about it too openly. Oh, you wanted a, āUnited Front,ā against Trump? Do you blame Harris for failing to unite the party behind her? You know, the fucking job of a leader? Nope, itās the lefts fault for not falling in line.
Like, I donāt even know what to do with this anymore. Youāre watching the Democratic coalition collapsed under the partyās mismanagement, and youāre blaming the coalition instead of party. Get a grip, Pug, FFS.
Fucking incredible how far youāll go to blame everyone but the people responsible for the loss. Oh, did Harrisā shitty campaign cause widespread voter apathy? Donāt blame the campaign for that,
Iāve said numerous times that Harris ran a shit campaign, and that sheās to blame.
blame the people who talked about it too openly.
Oh, is that what you think Iām criticizing? People saying āHarris is running a poor campaignā?
Oh, you wanted a, āUnited Front,ā against Trump? Do you blame Harris for failing to unite the party behind her? You know, the fucking job of a leader? Nope, itās the lefts fault for not falling in line.
Literally and explicitly said, to you, in this conversation, that the left wasnāt the lynchpin of any of this. But who needs facts when you have windmills to tilt against?
Like, I donāt even know what to do with this anymore. Youāre watching the Democratic coalition collapsed under the partyās mismanagement, and youāre blaming the coalition instead of party. Get a grip, Pug, FFS.
Youāre watching 90 million people say they donāt care if fascism wins, so long as those horrible LIBERAL ELITES lose; and then saying thatās not the voters punishing the powerless for the sins of the powerful.
Is this more hypocrisy, or more cognitive dissonance?
Literally and explicitly said, to you, in this conversation, that the left wasnāt the lynchpin of any of this. But who needs facts when you have windmills to tilt against?
Last point Iām gonna make here, then I need to move on with my life. Iām not saying that if the left united behind Harris it would have turned the tide, Iām just responding to your demand for obedience from the left instead of leadership from the party. For the record, no, I highly doubt that, if all the people who cast protest votes instead voted for Harris, it would have changed the outcome.
For Harris to have won, she would have needed to win all the votes she lost to apathy. Most people who donāt like a candidate donāt stay home in protest or vote third party, they just convince themselves that one vote doesnāt matter and decide to do laundry or cook dinner instead of standing in a poll line.
So Iām not gonna blame voters for being unmotivated, Iām gonna blame Harris for not motivating them. Iām not going to blame protest voters for withholding their vote, Iām gonna blame Harris for not addressing their protest. Iām not gonna blame critics of Harris for being too vocal, Iām going to blame Harris for giving us so much to criticize. Because only an idiot would think itās more productive to scold the 275 million Americans who didnāt vote for Harris instead of demanding change from the handful of Democrats who run the party. Now thatās tilting against windmills, Pug.
Do you not think campaigning has an effect?
If all it took was people on social grumbling about their terrible policy plank to sink the campaign, maybe, just maybe, they ran a shit campaign and thereās lessons to be learned.
āThe Dems ran a shit campaignā and āMaybe running negative PR campaigns against a candidate reduces a candidateās supportā are not mutually exclusive options.
Tl;Dr the election was the only place that we had to have that discussion.
Look, there was a primary in the literal sense, I voted in it, but there wasnāt a primary in the practical sense. There were no debates, no discussion of his platform for '24, Biden didnāt campaign, and the Democratic party / Biden Campaign worked HARD to shut down questions about Bidenās viability or the Mandela effect where everyone seemed to remember him promising to be a single term president. I mean, I could swear I remember it too; Iām still puzzled about where so many folks got the idea. Then, once we were way past the primary, we found out that Biden was nowhere even near viable shape for the campaign trail. He put on the most disastrously bad debate performance in presidential debate history against an opponent that should have been (and was just four years prior) a joke. None of his other āsee? Heās fineā appearances before or after inspired much faith either. So, we basically ended up with Harris and zero discussion about her platform. At first, I was really excited and eager to see what her platform would be. As time went on, though, I started seeing more and more that reminded me of HRC '16 and less meat to get excited about. If there had been a real primary in a practical sense, I would not have voted for Harris (and didnāt vote for Biden, I think I voted Phillips) on the platform she had.
The primaries are a time for the campaigns to work with voters and figure this stuff out, see what appeals to the base and is likely to get them to turn out. We never got to have that conversation with Harris, we barely had it at all with Biden. The only place we could have it is during the election, and my hope was (and remains) that campaigns are agile enough to respond when their base gives them feedback. I donāt support the Democrats because theyāre Democrats, I support them because they offer the closest practical path to policies I want to see enacted. I want to see good policy win, and I think good policy will get the democrats their wins. We canāt ever improve if we canāt be accept criticism, and when it comes to politics, the appropriate way to criticize is a bit like finding the appropriate way to protest according to Fox News. We need to have these conversations to get better, and I absolutely do blame the Harris and Biden campaigns for putting themselves in such vulnerable positions and failing to respond appropriately to criticism. Their job is to get elected, and they failed.
Shitty as it was, there was no third or fourth option to be had; once Harris was in the driverās seat, it was going to be her or Trump, simply by the way our political system is set up. With that in mind, going forward, all questions would have to boil down to āIs it preferable for Harris to enter into the presidency, or Trump?ā
If itās election-time in 1930 Weimar Germany, and my only viable choices in the election district Iām in are the SDP and the Nazis, banging the drum 24/7 on how the SDP is anti-LGBT (true) might not be the greatest choice in the coming election considering that the only other choice are the Nazis, who are MORE anti-LGBT plus a whole host of other horrific things. And if the Nazis themselves are beating that same drum, telling LGBT folk that the SDP is anti-LGBT, I might step back and consider whose electoral victory Iām contributing to by my rhetoric and what consequences it will have - such as on, say, LGBT folk.
Weāre sitting here with literal fascists in government. āOur aristocrats werenāt good enough, or didnāt take the correct stance on foreign policy!ā isnāt the correct answer to why this election turned out the way it did. Or if it is, that reflects such a broken attitude on the part of the American electorate that itās not much better than the actual conclusion - most Americans do not care if fascism comes into power. And that includes everyone who didnāt vote, or protest voted. And many of those who didnāt vote or protest voted were inspired to do so by rhetoric encouraging apathy from both conservatives and their useful idiots.
Should the Dems have done a whole host of things differently, including having actual primaries? Are the Dems spineless corporate weasels? Are the Dems beholden to Israeli interests even in the face of a divided base? Yes, yes, yes. But none of that justifies āWeāre going to let or help the literal fascists win.ā
Look, my dude. The democrats were basically just trailing the republicans by maybe 12 years. At best, this victory would have bought us just a few more years of uneasy status quo and failing to address the causes and conditions that brought us to this point. As things were, we were getting our Nazi arc sooner or later. Iād rather choose no Nazis at all, and have the uncomfortable conversations needed to make that happen. Until we address the conditions that brought us to this point, we would, at any rate, inevitably tip into open fascism; shutting up, falling in line, and hoping that theyāll win if we donāt think bad thoughts about the democrats wonāt fix it. Letās face it, there wasnāt a political appetite for fixing it in the next four years, as there wasnāt in the last four years (see: Merrick Garland). We needed to fix it, and we still do.
Just so Iām clear, Iāve read chunks of Project 2025. My kids are on the chopping block. I am begging the democrats to do better than being diet Nazi.
Are you fucking kidding me?
Holy fucking shit.
Do you not remember the Republicans OR the Democrats 12 fucking years ago?
Oh, great, the āLetās just get it over withā argument.
Oh, okay, so are we in a better position to address those conditions now that Trump was elected, or worse?
Worse?
In every sense?
Huh.
That youāre sitting here saying the Dems were just following the GOP and that the Dems are āDiet Naziā, more now than they were previously, is exactly the kind of fact-free vibes-based fucking politics that I expect from my fellow Americans, and that fascists leverage so easily into voter apathy. I suppose it was stupid of me to expect people who took enough of an interest in politics to discuss it to have higher standards.
Not necessarily letās get it over with as much as āletās stop ratcheting right in order to win some elections and make stuff betterā. Since 2016, there has NEVER been a good time to vote third party or criticize the democrats. Basically, since Trump got on scene, the democrats became so completely fragile that you canāt say bad stuff about them or disagree with them or theyāll lose :(
But letās get real. The Harris campaign didnāt have a lot of meat to offer people, their entire strategy was ānot Trumpā. Thatās not great, but then itās also ānot Trumpā while telling everyone that the economy is fine actually, that theyāre going to keep giving Israel billions in bombs but donāt worry because theyāre totally going to do the ceasefire this time, that theyāre going to crack down on the border even harder, and that theyāre going to support expanding fracking. They werenāt saying āweāre the opposite of Trumpā when they said ānot Trumpā. This might as well have been a Republican primary with John Kasich vs Trump.
Well, anyway, I guess a few of us shattered the Harris campaign into a trillion tiny pieces when we tried to push for good policies that might have actually won them the election. Snark aside, I am legitimately disappointed that this is where things are at; we should have been able to fix it, but we didnāt have the political will, and now weāve already got democrats signalling the eagerness to work with the Trump presidency. Weāre here now, can we please talk about how to make stuff better yet?
Okay. Did the Trump victory make āratcheting rightā less likely?
No?
It made it more likely?
And reduces the chance of winning elections?
And ensures that everything is going to get worse?
There was no fucking reason for anyone who isnāt a fascist to sit this fucking one out.
Since Trump got on the scene, weāve had a literal fascist who has the only other party in the country in lockstep behind him; yes, it is kind of important that he be defeated at the ballot box? Jesus fucking Christ.
Which has been bipartisan for the past forty fucking years. Itās hardly proof that the Dems were āfollowing 12 years behind the GOPā. The Dem platform was the most anti-Israel Iāve seen in my lifetime, and while thatās damnation by faint praise, the message sent by the fucking electorate was: āThe more pro-Israel candidate has wonā
Almost 80% of Americans buy into the idea that thereās a ācrisisā on the border, with broad bipartisan support. Do you really think thatās the issue that discouraged people from voting for Harris?
Ah, yes, John Kasichās well known clean energy, free college, marijuana decriminalization, corporate tax raising, LGBT supporting, pro-DEI, anti-price gouging, pro-choice, public healthcare expansion platform.
āPeople in government want to work with those who hold power in governmentā
Who could have predicted this? If only there was something we couldāve done, like put someone else in power in the government.
Sure, we can bring up some form of action, and then everyone who played purity politics can say that our allies arenāt good enough to unite against fascists with, again, and we can repeat the 2024 election for every undertaking we have from here on out, electoral or otherwise.
Youāre right, Pug, a billion dollars in direct spending was derailed by people pointing out the bad things they were seeing. It definitely wasnāt the bad things that cost her the election, just the people acknowledging that the bad things existed and suggesting she do something different. I forgot, if youāre in a car with someone who is about to drive or a cliff, the best thing you can do is remain quiet; you wouldnāt want to distract the driver with your negativity. Once again, Pug, your brilliant insights have saved the day.
So you donāt think that negative campaigning against a candidate has an effect on the electorate?
I think itās not fucking magic, Pug. There was far more negative campaigning coming from the hundreds of millions spent by the Trump campaign. There was even more money spent by Harris to negatively campaign against Trump, for all the good it did. But leftists complaining online threw the election? Everyone needs to shut up and smile, because if they criticize the Democrats too loudly theyāll collapse? Is that where weāre at?
So?
There are millions of votes other than mine; it doesnāt mean that Iām not responsible for my vote, or my other actions.
No. But leftists playing negative PR games online contributed to the loss. Iāve said elsewhere, I donāt think they were the tipping point.
But neither was Iowa, yet everyone who voted for Trump or abstained in Iowa is a fucking contributor to the fascist regime.
Not being the deciding factor does not absolve you of the implications of your choices.
We were going into an election everyone knew was going to be close, against a literal fascist.
Maybe a little of the āUnited Frontā spirit wouldāve been welcome, instead of playing the usual games of āUndermine the SHITLIBSā when there was a candidate promising fascism, with the necessary background to confirm his intentions as sincere, as the only other choice in the running. Itās not even a question of āI oppose all aid to Israelā, but āHarris is a genocide supporter!ā The issue was not voicing policy concerns; it was attacking the less vile of the only two candidates who could win.
Tell me, if the election had been lost by a few dozen votes, instead of a touch under two million, would your response be different? Or would it still be āBeating the negative PR drum is Just My Opinionā?
Cant believe after all the messaging around this election that āShut up, give me your vote, and get zero concessionsā is still not attractive to people for some reason. I swear I heard it everywhere, from every blue maga shill and self aggrandizing liberal in the internetā¦ but despite it saturating the narrative she still tanked. Strange how that works.
Iām sorry that you didnāt get enough āconcessionsā to justify trying for less genocide instead of more genocide. We who are on the list for the death camps thank you for your moral fucking purity.
Man thereās something there you should try to split test the genocide lite angle for their 2028 campaign. Anything to avoid moving left right?
Once Israel is done murdering all of Palestine with Trumpās full support and the Palestinian genocide is no longer an issue that can be addressed, Iām sure youāll find some other excuse to avoid ever having to ādebaseā yourself by voting against minorities in the US being rounded up and sent to camps. Nothing is ever pure enough, except letting disadvantaged groups be murdered by conservatives, apparently.
Fucking incredible how far youāll go to blame everyone but the people responsible for the loss. Oh, did Harrisā shitty campaign cause widespread voter apathy? Donāt blame the campaign for that, blame the people who talked about it too openly. Oh, you wanted a, āUnited Front,ā against Trump? Do you blame Harris for failing to unite the party behind her? You know, the fucking job of a leader? Nope, itās the lefts fault for not falling in line.
Like, I donāt even know what to do with this anymore. Youāre watching the Democratic coalition collapsed under the partyās mismanagement, and youāre blaming the coalition instead of party. Get a grip, Pug, FFS.
Iāve said numerous times that Harris ran a shit campaign, and that sheās to blame.
Oh, is that what you think Iām criticizing? People saying āHarris is running a poor campaignā?
Literally and explicitly said, to you, in this conversation, that the left wasnāt the lynchpin of any of this. But who needs facts when you have windmills to tilt against?
Youāre watching 90 million people say they donāt care if fascism wins, so long as those horrible LIBERAL ELITES lose; and then saying thatās not the voters punishing the powerless for the sins of the powerful.
Is this more hypocrisy, or more cognitive dissonance?
Last point Iām gonna make here, then I need to move on with my life. Iām not saying that if the left united behind Harris it would have turned the tide, Iām just responding to your demand for obedience from the left instead of leadership from the party. For the record, no, I highly doubt that, if all the people who cast protest votes instead voted for Harris, it would have changed the outcome.
For Harris to have won, she would have needed to win all the votes she lost to apathy. Most people who donāt like a candidate donāt stay home in protest or vote third party, they just convince themselves that one vote doesnāt matter and decide to do laundry or cook dinner instead of standing in a poll line.
So Iām not gonna blame voters for being unmotivated, Iām gonna blame Harris for not motivating them. Iām not going to blame protest voters for withholding their vote, Iām gonna blame Harris for not addressing their protest. Iām not gonna blame critics of Harris for being too vocal, Iām going to blame Harris for giving us so much to criticize. Because only an idiot would think itās more productive to scold the 275 million Americans who didnāt vote for Harris instead of demanding change from the handful of Democrats who run the party. Now thatās tilting against windmills, Pug.
Sorry that you think that being apathetically welcoming towards literal fascism is excusable.